Re: [GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores

(2012/06/08 23:06), t.petch wrote:
> I would like to see this published as an RFC.

+1 I support publishing.

Regards,
-Shishio


> 
> The only discussion I see whether or not the title of 12.2 should have
> an initial capital - I think that it should.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Morrow"<christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
> To:<grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org>;<grow@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:41 PM
>> Folks,
>> There's been work on the draft:
>>     <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores>
>>
>> I think the commenters' comments were addressed by the authors.
>> Can we move this to WGLC now and clear that 6/19/2012 (June 19, 2012).
>>
>> Abstract of the draft:
>>    "The purpose of this document is to provide a discussion of the
>>     potential problems of using private, RFC1918, or non-globally-
>>     routable addressing within the core of an SP network.  The
> discussion
>>     focuses on link addresses and to a small extent loopback addresses.
>>     While many of the issues are well recognised within the ISP
>>     community, there appears to be no document that collectively
>>     describes the issues."
>>
>> Could there be some discussion on WGLC and  we'll see about  moving
>> this along to the IESG?
>>
>> -chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> GROW mailing list
>> GROW@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>