Re: [GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores

On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:06 AM, t.petch wrote:

> I would like to see this published as an RFC.
> 

Yah, me too…

W


> The only discussion I see whether or not the title of 12.2 should have
> an initial capital - I think that it should.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Morrow" <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
> To: <grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org>; <grow@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:41 PM
>> Folks,
>> There's been work on the draft:
>>   <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores>
>> 
>> I think the commenters' comments were addressed by the authors.
>> Can we move this to WGLC now and clear that 6/19/2012 (June 19, 2012).
>> 
>> Abstract of the draft:
>>  "The purpose of this document is to provide a discussion of the
>>   potential problems of using private, RFC1918, or non-globally-
>>   routable addressing within the core of an SP network.  The
> discussion
>>   focuses on link addresses and to a small extent loopback addresses.
>>   While many of the issues are well recognised within the ISP
>>   community, there appears to be no document that collectively
>>   describes the issues."
>> 
>> Could there be some discussion on WGLC and  we'll see about  moving
>> this along to the IESG?
>> 
>> -chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> GROW mailing list
>> GROW@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
> 

-- 
With Feudalism, it's your Count that votes.