Re: [GROW] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07: (with COMMENT)

Camilo Cardona <juancamilo.cardona@imdea.org> Tue, 15 September 2015 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <juancamilo.cardona@imdea.org>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C871B3697; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 04:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhWEXBOh-wIW; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 04:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from estafeta21.imdea.org (maquina46.madrimasd.org [193.145.15.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E88431B34D9; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 04:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estafeta21.imdea.org (imdea mail daemon) with ESMTP id 47E9F1B0046; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:47:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by antispam-antivirus system at imdea.org
Received: from estafeta21.imdea.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (estafeta21.imdea.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eM4YFo3ziHcK; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:47:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.16.4.198] (unknown [193.145.14.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: juancamilo.cardona) by estafeta21.imdea.org (imdea mail daemon) with ESMTPSA id D795F1B0045; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:47:55 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ABA05FE8-A1F0-44ED-9734-6CCB076505D5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Camilo Cardona <juancamilo.cardona@imdea.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150819150928.17399.77448.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:51:28 +0200
Message-Id: <C979DBCC-104A-4DE9-BB85-05410C27C59F@imdea.org>
References: <20150819150928.17399.77448.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/J9EzQPyPdDTH5OnHkFQTQAHskms>
Cc: grow-chairs@ietf.org, grow@ietf.org, draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats.ad@ietf.org, draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:51:34 -0000

Hello Stephen,

Thank you. Answers inline.

Camilo C.

> On 19 Aug 2015, at 17:09, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> - intro 1st sentence confuses me at least. The 2nd paragraph
> does explain it nicely though when I get to page 3. Maybe try
> re-word that opener? Or just delete para 1?

<JCC> I see your point, however, I personally understand it, so I wouldn’t know how to rephrase it without probably making it less comprehensible to others.
> 
> - Figure 4 is mentioned in 2.2.1, and includes AS65404, but
> that ASN is not mentioned in the text in that section which is
> confusing, or is there a typo? I also didn't quite follow the
> description in 2.2.1 either which may be related or
> independent;-)

<JCC> Agree. We’ll reformat the figure and remove AS65404 from it. 

> 
> - I'm guessing, but didn't check in detail that -07 includes
> changes from the secdir review [1] (which raised some nits).
> If so, thanks!

<JCC> Yes, we included them.

> 
>   [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05853.html
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow