IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-03.txt

Rick Casarez <rick.casarez@gmail.com> Thu, 15 October 2015 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rick.casarez@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527AB1B343C; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OxNyJZtQ3nqz; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DCF21B343A; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lffv3 with SMTP id v3so40943493lff.0; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hTPSAxpexpyKEAjBNFVoSNunApvXuyEEH0BLWvmzX/Q=; b=QiDIyu32le7UkGb8j/Js+/0GCKCMQHxn6XzgqbpCFT9asRnv6AVu/WOUPJ3f5jsuXv vWiXpmOoZcKmeyO1a0j1HDWkBOwgvIESdt/tupMFZcY3oejZISwNP9tYhm3uq3VQYpzy Z5MSzi3Ol6wOR6rma9bXTWD49xyKWBuoG/w1LRVJsocOZM2r7Zb0PCcC/9848Zf5woAO YacacMGn+N2oXfY3LZrbGDZr2+VPtWTgEsfE9++AEn9iQ9jlxq/oUyhmCe/r9Cakdgdy EsyGnZiVUc2aEnGTtJLItZui+JJ7tKTB8IGdMIzGknzE6TJzy8m5m09phOm2Fw//3BXm NC9w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.211.8 with SMTP id my8mr210715wic.21.1444933224401; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.27.22.71 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151014145246.GB28921@pfrc.org>
References: <20151013023752.6150.44639.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CY1PR09MB0793771C894AACE8A552AA3184300@CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <20151014145246.GB28921@pfrc.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:20:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGWMUT4eoDnbC6ga6RM772-xGsV3Umz7aMujxvmBqitdw8CpuQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rick Casarez <rick.casarez@gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c38e0e9096b5052228bb04"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/YlW67EucqWfpMKuWwa7rJOGIrsc>
Cc: idr wg list <idr@ietf.org>, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, Charles van Niman <charles@phukish.com>, "Andrei Robachevsky (robachevsky@isoc.org)" <robachevsky@isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-03.txt
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:20:28 -0000

I would concur on Jeff's suggestion.

Otherwise I like the draft.

-------------------
Cheers, Rick

Experiences not things.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:58:26AM +0000, Sriram, Kotikalapudi wrote:
> > This version (draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-03)
> > is a significantly revised and updated draft relative to version-02.
> > The document (version-02) was in WGLC in the GROW WG.
> > Many thanks to Charles, Jeff, Wes and Andrei for their
> > review, comments, and support in response to WGLC
> > in GROW (it was cross posted to IDR as well).
> > The authors have considered all their comments/suggestions in revising
> this draft,
> > and we feel that it has significantly benefited  from their recent
> review/re-review.
>
> Thanks, Sriram.  You've addressed my comments.
>
> Should there be an additional edits, I'd suggest removing "subprefix" and
> consistently using "more specific prefix".
>
> -- Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email