Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores

Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> Fri, 18 May 2012 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@inex.ie>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFA221F8599; Fri, 18 May 2012 04:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gSl9UbtQagI2; Fri, 18 May 2012 04:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.acquirer.com (mail.acquirer.com [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0903321F8597; Fri, 18 May 2012 04:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: opsec@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local (inet-gw.acquirer.com [87.198.142.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.acquirer.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4IB4RDS094464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 May 2012 12:04:27 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@inex.ie)
Message-ID: <4FB62CE1.3050805@inex.ie>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:05:05 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76BA8836D@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76BA8836D@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
X-Company-Info-1: Internet Neutral Exchange Association Limited. Registered in Ireland No. 253804
X-Company-Info-2: Registered Offices: 1-2, Marino Mart, Fairview, Dublin 3
X-Company-Info-3: Internet Neutral Exchange Association Limited is limited by guarantee
X-Company-Info-4: Offices: 4027 Kingswood Road, Citywest, Dublin 24.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:05:09 -0000

On 17/05/2012 17:11, Ronald Bonica wrote:
> Thanks for introducing this document! 
> 
> I would like to bring the authors' attention to the following documents
> that are working in OPSEC:
> 
> - draft-behringer-lla-only
> - draft-baker-opsec-passive-ip-address
> 
> To some extent, draft-grow and draft-behringer are debating with one
> another. While draft-baker is not directly involved in the debate, it is
> not uninvolved, either. It is a shame that the three documents are being
> considered in different WGs.

yes, certainly draft-behringer and draft-grow are discussing a
substantially similar issue - namely using non-routable interface addresses
in the core.  tbh, it's not really possible to manage a network without
traceroute and remote interface ping.

Wes George posted a more complete response here:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02191.html

I agree fully with his analysis on all points.

Nick