IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores

Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com> Fri, 08 June 2012 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D1621F881D for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 10:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id haKGa2FqYLI2 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 10:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0234921F87F5 for <grow@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 10:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so1691528ggn.31 for <grow@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rbvn05k1U2O/5uHTw12qTRARAsxf7EuCAEXpUviYg70=; b=Qa76LVz2gKWIHvSMm3YovHrV4ADVrgj5gsoItCBfCIcy/EjDNxz7hDlLJseqZCKSVy 3joTifybWhp+Ds+dCm7zQi97eI0UIopUbWP5V6Ls6Adn6OrGAr4J5rOBQJD0V0XQy8MZ HNNigdCmes+WxPRcNe6f3BO7EnqaB6TGh+Xj2PASIbqM4z83jZVcJ8+t1valD6dylCSl P88bLclQ44lgvX6kpLaL/kmRUyio4vl4fxST6UQYxSKDi7QUdM+kTOwLXN1NvlAmv3Zm Xi7994kD25cbEoj/TBlINe2STMP4KqLGq2Gd4tKm2xaCrv0oQQm9YqzC6tIWlG1AiCtK 03TQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.20.70 with SMTP id l6mr7957811oee.38.1339175313451; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.166.71 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 10:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <01e301cd4580$208f3900$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <CAL9jLabADdWCwDhBdaBJ4fVdk9a=OeJQYFQM4Z_+-P56cVWftw@mail.gmail.com> <01e301cd4580$208f3900$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:08:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL9jLabZ0+q25DYR_bpP9fSks7+rauOWorP0oDe=2DB0rc-bQg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: grow@ietf.org, grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:08:37 -0000

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:06 AM, t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
> I would like to see this published as an RFC.

thanks, I don't disagree.

> The only discussion I see whether or not the title of 12.2 should have
> an initial capital - I think that it should.

that seems like something that can get cleaned up by the editor if it
comes to it...

would be nice if more folk would chime in, however, in either the
positive or negative.

> Tom Petch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Morrow" <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
> To: <grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org>; <grow@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:41 PM
>> Folks,
>> There's been work on the draft:
>>    <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores>
>>
>> I think the commenters' comments were addressed by the authors.
>> Can we move this to WGLC now and clear that 6/19/2012 (June 19, 2012).
>>
>> Abstract of the draft:
>>   "The purpose of this document is to provide a discussion of the
>>    potential problems of using private, RFC1918, or non-globally-
>>    routable addressing within the core of an SP network.  The
> discussion
>>    focuses on link addresses and to a small extent loopback addresses.
>>    While many of the issues are well recognised within the ISP
>>    community, there appears to be no document that collectively
>>    describes the issues."
>>
>> Could there be some discussion on WGLC and  we'll see about  moving
>> this along to the IESG?
>>
>> -chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> GROW mailing list
>> GROW@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email