Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Thu, 12 October 2017 12:58 UTC
Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA2D13305F; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 05:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.617
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fUN4GEvZij0r; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 05:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta241.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB0541344C2; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 05:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.6]) by opfedar23.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 5C6841604C4; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:58:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.41]) by opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 1957840058; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:58:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06]) by OPEXCLILM31.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::2cc9:4bac:7b7d:229d%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:58:11 +0200
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com
To: Ben Maddison <benm@workonline.co.za>, Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, Matthew Miller <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
Thread-Index: AdNB/CiT8KaS4TxwBEigJnx+TfKFCwBXX3/A
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:58:11 +0000
Message-ID: <30710_1507813092_59DF66E4_30710_448_10_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A478AD2F1@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <1a83ad38-d29c-4ecb-950f-3a8bdebe8c5a@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <1a83ad38-d29c-4ecb-950f-3a8bdebe8c5a@email.android.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A478AD2F1OPEXCLILM21corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/m21MIv_wx7bI9RPxoFwyGEN5DoM>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:58:15 -0000
Please see inline [Bruno] From: GROW [mailto:grow-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ben Maddison Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 9:16 PM To: Jay Borkenhagen Cc: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; grow@ietf.org; Job Snijders; Matthew Miller; gen-art@ietf.org Subject: Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11 Hi all, On 10 Oct 2017 5:50 pm, Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org<mailto:jayb@braeburn.org>> wrote: Job Snijders writes: > > The LOCAL_PREF choice here is a simple thing -- don't make it more > > complicated than it needs to be. > > > > Job's suggested text says all that's necessary: > > > > "The LOCAL_PREF value SHOULD be lower than any of the alternative > > paths. Zero being the lowest value, it MAY be used whichever > > LOCAL_PREF values are used by the AS." > > The above comes from Bruno's hand, I actually proposed the following: > > "The LOCAL_PREF value SHOULD be lower than any of the > alternative paths. It is RECOMMEND to use 0, the lowest LOCAL_PREF > value." > > Kind regards, > > Job Sorry for my mis-citing / mis-quoting. Let me try my hand: The LOCAL_PREF value SHOULD be lower than any of the alternative paths. The RECOMMENDED value is 0. That formulation gets my vote. If operators have a good reason to deviate from the recommendation, they will know that without it being pointed out in the document. [Bruno] Works for me. Draft updated. --Bruno Thanks. Jay B. Cheers, Ben _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org<mailto:GROW@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
- [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow… Matthew Miller
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… bruno.decraene
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… Job Snijders
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… bruno.decraene
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… Job Snijders
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… bruno.decraene
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… David Farmer
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… Jay Borkenhagen
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… Job Snijders
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… Jay Borkenhagen
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… Ben Maddison
- Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… bruno.decraene
- Re: [GROW] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of d… Alissa Cooper