[GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-diverse-bgp-path-dist-07

"Peter Schoenmaker" <pds@lugs.com> Mon, 11 June 2012 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <pds@lugs.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8BE21F85CE for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z52IP-hQlf08 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from murdock.lugs.com (murdock.lugs.com [192.80.15.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EA121F8573 for <grow@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r9m1fw1 (unknown [61.8.239.2]) by murdock.lugs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3451D35B2 for <grow@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:54:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Peter Schoenmaker <pds@lugs.com>
To: grow@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:54:46 +0800
Message-ID: <005c01cd47e2$267e8820$737b9860$@lugs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005D_01CD4825.34A300A0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac1H4crcZ3Q1XdDURpGiyMYCordLaQ==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: [GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-diverse-bgp-path-dist-07
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:54:54 -0000

Hi,

 

Based on discussion at the last Grow meeting in Paris, it was agreed that
draft-ietf-grow-diverse-bgp-path-dist-07 is ready for working group last
call.  It would be good to have some discussion on the draft before
submitting it to the IESG.

 

Abstract

 

   The BGP4 protocol specifies the selection and propagation of a single

   best path for each prefix.  As defined and widely deployed today BGP

   has no mechanisms to distribute alternate paths which are not

   considered best path between its speakers.  This behaviour results in

   number of disadvantages for new applications and services.

 

   This document presents an alternative mechanism for solving the

   problem based on the concept of parallel route reflector planes.

   Such planes can be built in parallel or they can co-exist on the

   current route reflection platforms.  Document also compares existing

   solutions and proposed ideas that enable distribution of more paths

   than just the best path.

 

   This proposal does not specify any changes to the BGP protocol

   definition.  It does not require upgrades to provider edge or core

   routers nor does it need network wide upgrades.

 

 

Thanks

 

Peter