IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] On LC for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv (ends December 1st 2021)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 14 December 2021 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC07E3A0CC2 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 05:50:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nRq8SDnfHf07 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 05:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6453A0CDE for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 05:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 748891E2F5; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:49:55 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3B97D015-85A4-425F-B24F-DBB7D7F58C33"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <76fffa26-6b71-b77f-a65a-866a1637a423@ntt.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:49:54 -0500
Cc: Job Snijders <job=40fastly.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, grow@ietf.org
Message-Id: <27AE04F8-F64D-4A01-8817-DFEBBEF3DE6F@pfrc.org>
References: <d7828b07-8f2d-1642-4a12-ea0606b68343@ntt.net> <YZPZUdnQN3BC5CgN@vurt.sobornost.net> <ZRAP278MB0176E2FD40048FFCAC59B1FE89999@ZRAP278MB0176.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <Yajh8yO+qBRwqG6X@snel> <20211208165708.GD19663@pfrc.org> <76fffa26-6b71-b77f-a65a-866a1637a423@ntt.net>
To: Paolo Lucente <paolo@ntt.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/uGj8oNNJUUerGk4dRntN51Pl5VU>
Subject: Re: [GROW] On LC for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv (ends December 1st 2021)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:50:01 -0000

Paolo,

> On Dec 13, 2021, at 6:21 PM, Paolo Lucente <paolo@ntt.net> wrote:
> 
> Agree & ack your final remarks about properties of introducing optional TLVs in Route Monitoring messages. Would you like to see them mentioned in the draft?

It's worth a sentence or two at most.  While it's one of those things that theoretically is obvious to the implementor, I've grown cynical over the years as to how "obvious" shows up in software. :-)

-- Jeff

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email