[GROW] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-12: (with COMMENT)

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-12: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm balloting "yes" because I think it's important to publish this. But, like
Alvaro,  I wonder why this is not standards track, BCP, or just about anything
but informational. So I support his DISCUSS, including his the comments on how
to resolve it.

-1, last paragraph: This references RFC 8174, but does not use the actual 8174
boilerplate. Is there a reason not to do so?