Re: [GROW] On LC for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv (ends December 1st 2021)

Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com> Mon, 06 December 2021 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDC43A09C1 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 02:04:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vPIVCnmO2Y2h for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 02:04:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0533A09B5 for <grow@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 02:04:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4J6zX15cbRz67wFS for <grow@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:03:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.182) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 11:04:16 +0100
Received: from kwepeml500004.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.141) by kwepeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:04:15 +0800
Received: from kwepeml500004.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.141]) by kwepeml500004.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.020; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:04:15 +0800
From: Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
To: "Matthias.Arnold@swisscom.com" <Matthias.Arnold@swisscom.com>, "job=40fastly.com@dmarc.ietf.org" <job=40fastly.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "paolo@ntt.net" <paolo@ntt.net>
CC: "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [GROW] On LC for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv (ends December 1st 2021)
Thread-Index: AQHX2wV/1bNwPBAaOkKTWICfiPVUMKwlJO2ggAAy/oA=
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 10:04:15 +0000
Message-ID: <235f0ae039354cfbbf8b965ef1425a23@huawei.com>
References: <d7828b07-8f2d-1642-4a12-ea0606b68343@ntt.net> <YZPZUdnQN3BC5CgN@vurt.sobornost.net> <ZR0P278MB0492D5ECB599BCBE008A6F15926D9@ZR0P278MB0492.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <ZR0P278MB0492D5ECB599BCBE008A6F15926D9@ZR0P278MB0492.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.152.178]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/xtRanTzQqOcr0NLmv6dJiAjIfgU>
Subject: Re: [GROW] On LC for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv (ends December 1st 2021)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 10:04:26 -0000

Hi Matthias,

Indeed, adding an ADD-PATH capability TLV to the Route Monitoring message will be a good use case.
In this way, when the BMP server parses the BGP Update message containing the ADD-PATH ID, it does not need to check the related Peer Up notification message again.

BR,
Shunwan

-----Original Message-----
From: GROW [mailto:grow-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Matthias.Arnold@swisscom.com
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 2:54 PM
To: job=40fastly.com@dmarc.ietf.org; paolo@ntt.net
Cc: grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] On LC for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv (ends December 1st 2021)

Hallo GROW WG

I've read the draft. 
TLV on BMP monitoring- and peerdown-messages complete BMP and make it uniform.
I am looking very forward to collect ADD-PATH on our collectors as a standard to bring more visability (a.e. backup-path) to our BGP monitoring.
I think the draft is ready to forward to IESG.

Have a good week
Matthias


-----Original Message-----
From: GROW <grow-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Job Snijders
Sent: Dienstag, 16. November 2021 17:16
To: Paolo Lucente <paolo@ntt.net>
Cc: grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org <grow@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [GROW] On LC for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv (ends December 1st 2021)

Dear all,

This starts the formal WGLC period which will run from November 16th until December 1st 2021.

Please review https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv-06&amp;data=04%7C01%7CMatthias.Arnold%40swisscom.com%7C67562bce3536413b2e1008d9a91ca0db%7C364e5b87c1c7420d9beec35d19b557a1%7C0%7C0%7C637726762696880424%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=1FAQOy3X%2FtjxztaFoNEwcOT4bZGliXRcnTHZbFPc%2FRQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
and provide comments or feedback on the grow@ietf.org mailing list!

Kind regards,

Job

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:11:56PM +0100, Paolo Lucente wrote:
> Dear Colleagues, Dear Chairs,
> 
> A brief email to follow-up the presentation of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv 
> last week at the WG meeting. We authors believe there are no more 
> items to work on for this draft, received inputs were processed and 
> any questions / concerns were addressed. I'd hence like to ask to LC this work.
> 
> You may read motivation for this work in the draft itself, let me 
> supplement it saying that this is a key piece of work that would make 
> extensible every BMP message defined so far; this, in turn, would 
> bring BMP on par with other modern monitoring (/ telemetry) protocols (/ stacks / solutions).
> 
> Paolo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgrow&amp;data=04%7C01%7CMatthias.Arnol
> d%40swisscom.com%7C67562bce3536413b2e1008d9a91ca0db%7C364e5b87c1c7420d
> 9beec35d19b557a1%7C0%7C0%7C637726762696880424%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8
> eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3
> 000&amp;sdata=kVCMQOI9D41eBKF4%2FdYiZHyuEG%2Bdm3eM7ls5yLzCSzU%3D&amp;r
> eserved=0

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgrow&amp;data=04%7C01%7CMatthias.Arnold%40swisscom.com%7C67562bce3536413b2e1008d9a91ca0db%7C364e5b87c1c7420d9beec35d19b557a1%7C0%7C0%7C637726762696880424%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=kVCMQOI9D41eBKF4%2FdYiZHyuEG%2Bdm3eM7ls5yLzCSzU%3D&amp;reserved=0

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow