[GSMP] RFC 3292 vs standard

sanmittal@hss.hns.com Tue, 20 August 2002 05:21 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA25201 for <gsmp-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 01:21:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id BAA15324 for gsmp-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 01:23:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost []) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA15237; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 01:22:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin []) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA15207 for <gsmp@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 01:22:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hindon.hss.co.in ([]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA25176 for <gsmp@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 01:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: sanmittal@hss.hns.com
Received: from ultra.hss.co.in (ultra.hss.hns.com []) by hindon.hss.co.in (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id g7K5Lhv25169 for <gsmp@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:51:43 +0530 (IST)
Received: from sandesh.hss.hns.com (localhost []) by ultra.hss.co.in (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id g7K5MZG25967 for <gsmp@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:52:35 +0530 (IST)
Received: by sandesh.hss.hns.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) id 65256C1B.001CFEAB ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:46:42 +0530
X-Lotus-FromDomain: HSS
To: gsmp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <65256C1B.001CFBC4.00@sandesh.hss.hns.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:54:12 +0530
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [GSMP] RFC 3292 vs standard
Sender: gsmp-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: gsmp-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: General Switch Management Protocol <gsmp.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: gsmp@ietf.org

hi !!

 I have a very samll query but i need to know urgently.
 I have been exploring the evolution of the gsmp standard.

I have been comparing that draft-ietf-gsmp-11.txt is almost similar with all the
and sub-headings. The standard documnet RFC 3292 also seems to be similar.

Can somebody suggest me where can i find the information about the differences
between them. I need them urgently.

thanks and warm regards

DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Hughes Software Systems
Limited (HSS) and is intended solely for the use of the individual
to whom it is addressed. It may contain  privileged or confidential
information  and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other
than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using,
copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. HSS accepts
no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information
transmitted by this email including damage from virus.

GSMP mailing list