[GSMP] Issue of MPLS configuration

avri <avri@sm.luth.se> Thu, 08 August 2002 18:01 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA21392 for <gsmp-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id OAA21048 for gsmp-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:02:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost []) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA20196; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:00:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin []) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA20082 for <gsmp@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:59:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA21281 for <gsmp@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:58:13 -0400 (EDT)
X-Info: This message was accepted for relay by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication
X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVYfzbbCVUKtHSizYOAaAU+hoJSNfLPcmNjij53w7RE2enFb5tY9RLke
Received: from wsip68-15-42-104.ri.ri.cox.net ([] helo=sm.luth.se) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #6) id 17crZG-0000k6-00 for gsmp@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 13:59:27 -0400
Message-ID: <3D52B1A9.4010108@sm.luth.se>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 14:00:09 -0400
From: avri <avri@sm.luth.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020721
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gsmp <gsmp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [GSMP] Issue of MPLS configuration
Sender: gsmp-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: gsmp-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: General Switch Management Protocol <gsmp.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: gsmp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

As you can read from this question, which was published on the 
MPLS list, is also relevant to the GSMP WG.

I invite discussion.


(ps. i know i am late getting our minutes out - completely my
fault - i will attempt to get it done real soon now)


Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> I think I am missing two important pieces w.r.t. the MIBS
> and that is the main concerns and the status and next steps. 
> They can be copied from my slides as I saw them. 
> I think Loa added that we need at least another WG Last Call
> (once we see new revs) and that discussion is needed if 
> things have become too complex and which pieces people have 
> (or intend to) impement(ed).
> My slides showed:
> - Main concerns/worries:
>   o How do Label Distribution Protocols, SNMP, 
>     Manual config, GSMP interact and make sure
>     they do not step on each others toes??
>   o How are assignments under mplsMIB controlled?
>   o Who is implementing all these Mibs?
>   o How is the impact on follow up (G)MPLS MIBs?
> - Status/Action plan
>   o Authors have answered a lot of comments and 
>     supposedly know what needs to be fixed.
>   o Authors revising MIBs to address comments.
>     Sofar I have received a new TC MIB, need
>     revisions of all otehr MIBs
>   o Then will need to re-review (MIB-Doctor)
>   o I want the WG to re-review as well and make 
>     sure that you all agree, before it gets approved
>   o Means another WG Last Call (or so I think)
> Thanks,
> Bert 

GSMP mailing list