IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Fw: [GSMP] more changes to the base draft

"Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com> Sat, 06 December 2003 01:06 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA05304 for <gsmp-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 20:06:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ASQtZ-00059F-Hl for gsmp-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:06:05 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hB616560019788 for gsmp-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 20:06:05 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ASQtZ-000595-Cm for gsmp-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:06:05 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA05287 for <gsmp-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 20:05:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ASQtX-0005R4-00 for gsmp-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:06:03 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ASQtW-0005R0-00 for gsmp-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:06:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ASQtV-00058V-Tv; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:06:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ASQsv-000586-3q for gsmp@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:05:25 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA05277 for <gsmp@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 20:05:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ASQss-0005Qm-00 for gsmp@ietf.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:05:23 -0500
Received: from fmr06.intel.com ([134.134.136.7] helo=caduceus.jf.intel.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ASQss-0005Qf-00 for gsmp@ietf.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:05:22 -0500
Received: from petasus.jf.intel.com (petasus.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.6]) by caduceus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.11 2003/12/03 18:29:28 root Exp $) with ESMTP id hB615OLk023781; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 01:05:24 GMT
Received: from orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.206]) by petasus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.6 2003/12/04 00:48:44 root Exp $) with SMTP id hB613jHl021920; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 01:04:42 GMT
Received: from orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.56]) by orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.1.32) with SMTP id M2003120517032413902 ; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:03:26 -0800
Received: from orsmsx410.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.64]) by orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:03:06 -0800
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
Subject: RE: Fw: [GSMP] more changes to the base draft
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:03:06 -0800
Message-ID: <9CB758BBEE58754F8F33234D75B9F4B00119B2AA@orsmsx410.jf.intel.com>
Thread-Topic: Fw: [GSMP] more changes to the base draft
Thread-Index: AcO0FE8ollH5HX8hS02nhK8azqouwQHb790w
From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
To: "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org>, <gsmp@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Dec 2003 01:03:06.0587 (UTC) FILETIME=[B52FD2B0:01C3BB94]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: gsmp-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: gsmp-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: gsmp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gsmp>, <mailto:gsmp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General Switch Management Protocol WG <gsmp.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gsmp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gsmp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gsmp>, <mailto:gsmp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Avri

I had one question on this..
Technically speaking GRMP seems quite different from GSMP v3
to me. How could you possibly merge these protocols ?
I must be missing something here.


Thanks
Hormuzd

-----Original Message-----
From: gsmp-admin@ietf.org [mailto:gsmp-admin@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Avri
Doria
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:55 AM
To: gsmp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [GSMP] more changes to the base draft


Hi Weiming,

comments inline.

On onsdag, nov 26, 2003, at 17:52 Asia/Seoul, Wang,Weiming wrote:

>
>  Hi Avri,
>
>  I'm writing to seek the possiblity in GSMP base header to add 
> following items:
>
>  1. A proirity flag to indicate the processing priority for the 
> message.

Can you explain how you would think this should be used?

>  2. An optional checksum part in GSMP for error control.

Again, can you explain how you would want to see this used?

>
>  If possible, I also ask to leave some space in the Version field for 
> possible including of other
>  possible protocols like GRMP 
> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-forces-grmp-01.txt).

  If the two protocols were to be merged it would seem to make the most 
sense to me for there to be one base protocol which supported the MPLS 
and GMPLS mode as well as the router mode.  I would personally be 
uncomfortable with one version of the protocol for switches and one for 
routers.  In many respects I think that the support  one would need for 
adding messages for router support already exists.

If this merge is something that is of interest to the Wg and something 
we can get IESG support for (i think it would require a charter 
amendment) then I think we could certainly work out the details here on 
the list.

I do think your first 2 requests can be discussed within the current  
work without any charter  problems.  For the other, I would like to 
hear from other list members on whether it is something that the WG 
should pursue.

a.


_______________________________________________
GSMP mailing list
GSMP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gsmp

_______________________________________________
GSMP mailing list
GSMP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gsmp

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email