Re: [hackathon] Interop testing within hackathon network

Juhamatti Kuusisaari <juhamatk@gmail.com> Fri, 12 March 2021 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <juhamatk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC78B3A17E9 for <hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 02:38:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pk-I-GmYXS9p for <hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 02:38:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE4733A17E7 for <hackathon@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 02:38:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id lr13so52466771ejb.8 for <hackathon@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 02:38:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eFDtP0Y5oyhE6jknFsCbI22zxq3iGNEFRIGN31RKClA=; b=ZpnmdluUM+8Qz0pdk76rxx9rlOC0VrwOKjl+L4UmEnGNr4NkXGCL+L3AhYcLNykre3 ytrvGN8drdFjR/sfU4WiTUkKW1IcGkS6JqBKUwRGTXUt0K+BoP1k9n+tEQ+/qZasx1G2 oOX+6+bj/TgNH+4IkolLpuieTX9nF13hjco5U/TUD4qySEgG+Zk+0xOGXSk+nbuxH4/r ERXEModdeuAGPz4EMwsc55YoQD2D2x7XjG9TLTsHc8AygsxvTV/mJbiKvty/fDUKNvuF chS/eqm0AOcSwCybg7eJOThjgHme3obmfrBOHbiavhYAF0rhbj9tGwOi03t1OcRiFFnp ktfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eFDtP0Y5oyhE6jknFsCbI22zxq3iGNEFRIGN31RKClA=; b=URWib6XoVoru2g4tjSJIGVuVXraV2BYHdPrC0/1QT9oA+SYwXOGrLdWilKR3aurV8I EafKwxN0kQi7famRdv1jASgYwD1zB1hklUyzCzmpwHx8ceraZGdATuwxVy3kwoPArWHg qSw6BN7AU2eZE0VLDYlS0Bd44O5YBwfF7LLd3yJ36TwR8SZ2FXnwCOykFryNS68LSLvn DAJ63Z0GbCTUcN2jnhlWWd1bC2I4NcZoaTmhS9myzvYKDO8wsEa4HsINCC1x4cH8wc9G 3P7oJKGBgKZziXTolwSRY5i60xOrrXwd4pLshZLIi/axaqrAZYfcj5a6+7RGD6AuZ+Dv Y0VA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DtHd8ieM2Bm14a1vzLdEJhAJSkE9B5Bp1wLWVqUzeyltzsoUB xG3A/su8xa5awcsOnkljzoq0b1+GmplKOgqCrB0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxy+fCJhWG4XrPTljaIeK7gilpVJQ1Ai0lalONsMVWrZLkw5ZNbl6GhBZGTReEoAMh+3PLg6LCS56QSB8yddTU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:414e:: with SMTP id l14mr7494623ejk.406.1615545505175; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 02:38:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACS3ZpDBtsEptwBj-yOVR9-+bnKtBRcPxfT5OPuojHNO4rSczg@mail.gmail.com> <D3D8F06F-E68E-4C34-B9C7-3A8621B50ED8@cisco.com> <1108557973.1057823.1615495901722.JavaMail.zimbra@insa-lyon.fr> <DD39C726-5A0E-4414-AF43-F08C8643F439@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DD39C726-5A0E-4414-AF43-F08C8643F439@cisco.com>
From: Juhamatti Kuusisaari <juhamatk@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:36:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CACS3ZpDBv0riMO2Xef=0GZ_vOc=MxSqcnND4MCpS1qCf7s6njw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Cc: Pierre Francois <pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr>, "hackathon@ietf.org" <hackathon@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hackathon/6qEYEcHVqnQvjiZW7q3bZ-Jr8FY>
Subject: Re: [hackathon] Interop testing within hackathon network
X-BeenThere: hackathon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion regarding past, present, and future IETF hackathons." <hackathon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hackathon>, <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hackathon/>
List-Post: <mailto:hackathon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon>, <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:38:29 -0000

Hello,

It is nice though that the draft has no requirement for champions to
provide these resources. This way anyone can be the champion.

BR,
--
 Juhamatti

On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 23:21, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Pierre,
>
> Thanks, and yes, ultimately it is up to the project champions and the rest of the team to determine how they want to work and what tools they want to use. A goal of the hackathon is to provide an environment and tools that can be helpful.
>
> Cheers,
> Charles
>
> On 3/11/21, 12:52 PM, "Pierre Francois" <pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr> wrote:
>
>     Charles,
>
>     these are great initiatives, but shouldn't we simply rely on the champions to provide the env for interop testing?
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     Pierre.
>
>     ----- Mail original -----
>     > De: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
>     > À: "Juhamatti Kuusisaari" <juhamatk@gmail.com>om>, hackathon@ietf.org
>     > Envoyé: Jeudi 11 Mars 2021 21:47:50
>     > Objet: Re: [hackathon] Interop testing within hackathon network
>
>     > Hi Juhamatti,
>     >
>     > Shared compute resources were made available at some previous in person
>     > hackathons, but that practice stoped due to low utilization.
>     > For recent online only hackathons, we have provided remote networking options,
>     > as described here,
>     > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-eckel-shmoo-ietf-hackathon-03#section-6.8
>     >
>     > We ran into some complications that resulted in these services not being
>     > available for IETF 110, but we intend to offer something comparable for future
>     > hackathons. If so, would this work for the interop testing you have in mind?
>     >
>     > Cheers,
>     > Charles
>     >
>     >On 3/11/21, 8:06 AM, "hackathon on behalf of Juhamatti Kuusisaari"
>     ><hackathon-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of juhamatk@gmail.com> wrote:
>     >
>     >    Hello,
>     >
>     >    Just wondering how people have been doing interop testing in remote
>     >    hackathons so far, what would be the best practices? For my use case
>     >    the simplest thing would be to have a common server where a KVM image
>     >    would be instantiated and other KVM instances or even host processes
>     >    could connect to it over kernel switch. Anything like this available?
>     >
>     >    Thanks,
>     >    --
>     >     Juhamatti
>     >
>     >    _______________________________________________
>     >    hackathon mailing list
>     >    hackathon@ietf.org
>     >    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > hackathon mailing list
>     > hackathon@ietf.org
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon
>