Re: [hackathon] Interop testing within hackathon network

Pierre Francois <pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr> Thu, 11 March 2021 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr>
X-Original-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD343A09B5 for <hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:51:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I6YI8cdQtkA2 for <hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:51:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpout02-ext2.partage.renater.fr (smtpout02-ext2.partage.renater.fr [194.254.241.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F723A099F for <hackathon@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:51:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmtaout02.partage.renater.fr (zmtaout02.partage.renater.fr [194.254.241.30]) by smtpout20.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41907BFD53; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:51:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from zmtaout02.partage.renater.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaout02.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 656F320C5C; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:51:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaout02.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB6820C65; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:51:42 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zmtaout02.partage.renater.fr
Received: from zmtaout02.partage.renater.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmtaout02.partage.renater.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id st1gBXfr0ZYe; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:51:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from zstore-b3-033.partage.renater.fr (zstore-b3-033.partage.renater.fr [10.254.241.156]) by zmtaout02.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F09320C5C; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:51:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:51:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Pierre Francois <pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Juhamatti Kuusisaari <juhamatk@gmail.com>, hackathon@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1108557973.1057823.1615495901722.JavaMail.zimbra@insa-lyon.fr>
In-Reply-To: <D3D8F06F-E68E-4C34-B9C7-3A8621B50ED8@cisco.com>
References: <CACS3ZpDBtsEptwBj-yOVR9-+bnKtBRcPxfT5OPuojHNO4rSczg@mail.gmail.com> <D3D8F06F-E68E-4C34-B9C7-3A8621B50ED8@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.8_GA_3008 (ZimbraWebClient - GC88 (Win)/8.8.8_GA_1703)
Thread-Topic: Interop testing within hackathon network
Thread-Index: AQHXFpB1RFkg0b7sREatlRZHk6Hd4ap+vFwAeX6YXMY=
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamState: clean
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamScore: -100
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddvtddgudegudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucftgffptefvgfftnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvkfgjfhfugggtgffothesthhqtgdtredtjeenucfhrhhomheprfhivghrrhgvucfhrhgrnhgtohhishcuoehpihgvrhhrvgdrfhhrrghntghoihhssehinhhsrgdqlhihohhnrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieekfeduueeiteegfeffkeffjedtteetgeehffejuedugfeliefgjeeuhfejvedtnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepuddtrddvheegrddvgedurdduheeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepuddtrddvheegrddvgedurdduheeipdhhvghlohepiihsthhorhgvqdgsfedqtdeffedrphgrrhhtrghgvgdrrhgvnhgrthgvrhdrfhhrpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheprfhivghrrhgvucfhrhgrnhgtohhishcuoehpihgvrhhrvgdrfhhrrghntghoihhssehinhhsrgdqlhihohhnrdhfrheqpdhrtghpthhtohepvggtkhgvlhgtuhepgedttghishgtohdrtghomhesughmrghrtgdrihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhuhhgrmhgrthhksehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohephhgrtghkrghthhhonhesihgvthhfrdhorhhg
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hackathon/6zyQrBgavRaLHKz96Ro5uVqkMdw>
Subject: Re: [hackathon] Interop testing within hackathon network
X-BeenThere: hackathon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion regarding past, present, and future IETF hackathons." <hackathon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hackathon>, <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hackathon/>
List-Post: <mailto:hackathon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon>, <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:51:51 -0000

Charles, 

these are great initiatives, but shouldn't we simply rely on the champions to provide the env for interop testing?

Cheers, 

Pierre.

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> À: "Juhamatti Kuusisaari" <juhamatk@gmail.com>om>, hackathon@ietf.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 11 Mars 2021 21:47:50
> Objet: Re: [hackathon] Interop testing within hackathon network

> Hi Juhamatti,
> 
> Shared compute resources were made available at some previous in person
> hackathons, but that practice stoped due to low utilization.
> For recent online only hackathons, we have provided remote networking options,
> as described here,
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-eckel-shmoo-ietf-hackathon-03#section-6.8
> 
> We ran into some complications that resulted in these services not being
> available for IETF 110, but we intend to offer something comparable for future
> hackathons. If so, would this work for the interop testing you have in mind?
> 
> Cheers,
> Charles
> 
>On 3/11/21, 8:06 AM, "hackathon on behalf of Juhamatti Kuusisaari"
><hackathon-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of juhamatk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>    Hello,
> 
>    Just wondering how people have been doing interop testing in remote
>    hackathons so far, what would be the best practices? For my use case
>    the simplest thing would be to have a common server where a KVM image
>    would be instantiated and other KVM instances or even host processes
>    could connect to it over kernel switch. Anything like this available?
> 
>    Thanks,
>    --
>     Juhamatti
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    hackathon mailing list
>    hackathon@ietf.org
>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hackathon mailing list
> hackathon@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon