Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal
Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> Sun, 26 September 2021 19:58 UTC
Return-Path: <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
X-Original-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10463A045B
for <hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=nomountain-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id b5F5xpjNhKk1 for <hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DA63A0414
for <hackathon@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id g184so15726551pgc.6
for <hackathon@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=nomountain-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=8b4khuRW5jiXWAOxUC+7qGm8uJJXsOpAn0Fc7xHqMjc=;
b=nVcyKTw55oh/FbPG+VULfxtAOJq1qCCxd9TzodMvfyO+kkwepQzQRhdVavT102Thsz
Fb7HoqnQp2v3JWVp9PgttiRQnVJRuAmWA4FnyA7qjI414scZobzHBXKcc+DS08QbEsaX
0tvIAX2aIvSlG6YauIN8h/12Jt5/4ZQDCdVmjnneqNhYggUIuhj891hqzG86lF05vbmo
VShgv5VbKM0PdfmWerBq6ldPX0FIQwjreAETIAh1eLAP6V6TbjP4nT52I3dgvmJsZsjH
flGTw4VfzsnuGjx4U2jEp/2SQPGp1OFHFKXAgL0dAs2BHPR9w4ts/qiZJNWkErUgWeO3
F2cQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=8b4khuRW5jiXWAOxUC+7qGm8uJJXsOpAn0Fc7xHqMjc=;
b=J43qQUBGBs7LQdOMgzUnyfHZ5K3Ve4p+NGOAn3t4nG3iXckitf4VQsRS33aqnjX1xT
4S7G9LO+P5yrLnSAqb/4sVgcqI2GRcxpqCX3EvcFcMEjLEiiQN19+5fpBwcT6XVIH3tN
EpLeVOjjEptjFieaZFgLuLF1yXxLo17B1sfZi2gjn3tD/fsRUnbttYm3Rz7S/dCsYs2A
Qwyk6g7mGKiYSspZQUc64h0QlHoJ1madnGAKo9WfUSTqkRT0ooKMd5LIWU6gJCFhm4yT
RSwQ4Yyi7D70GJt5IAVMmda0JBnpvkVz4d1+XeH+jAKgbtdHSv4dd8XymH3k+kMWjMjS
KhGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532P/Q1Efx/L+fQVMr9+/x60ZoRu/sreIur4tR0JpgRYWtPq2XnI
KLvaLRTY0+TqmYWMPYM1a6y5PQyOZwwJ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4kk60FFohP0brAbkrnXTteWzMb+HxpKLqYiMLC2zCcKN5Av8nUZJBTuK/k1S/5cEyAAokCA==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:400c:: with SMTP id f12mr13510308pgp.296.1632686318458;
Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aspen-2.local (63-140-65-104.dynamic.lte.acsalaska.net.
[63.140.65.104])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g12sm8296709pjd.18.2021.09.26.12.58.37
for <hackathon@ietf.org>
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: hackathon@ietf.org
References: <00573533-daf2-772c-26d2-43c718fead5a@petit-huguenin.org>
<74DE946C-F121-4FCF-854D-FA216FB0858E@isc.org>
<1405997362.42827.1632681381150@connect.xfinity.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Message-ID: <d62c6553-1558-56d9-5ed2-2edfcfbc1661@nomountain.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 11:58:36 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1405997362.42827.1632681381150@connect.xfinity.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hackathon/TVLyggjOqoi_wjMXs1PRNG9bEb4>
Subject: Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal
X-BeenThere: hackathon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion regarding past, present,
and future IETF hackathons." <hackathon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hackathon>,
<mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hackathon/>
List-Post: <mailto:hackathon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon>,
<mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 19:58:45 -0000
On 9/26/21 10:36 AM, Sorin Faibish wrote: > My issue I have is not with the hackathon but with the legitimation of a > new IETF protocol as a result of the hackathon. I would guess that the likelihood of that happening approaches zero. I don't see how it would get through the chartering process, given the apparent lack of relevance to the IETF and the utter lack of domain expertise within the body of IETF participants. That said, I think it's the case that instituting a practice of policing hackathon topics beyond questions of legality (in which jurisdiction, though?) and violation of IETF policies around harassment and whatnot is probably more harmful than someone working on this stuff in the context of an IETF hackathon. Given that it's virtual, they aren't hoovering up valuable workspace in the hackathon venue, they are almost certainly not taking people away from working on things more relevant to the IETF, and so on. Melinda -- Melinda Shore melinda.shore@nomountain.net Software longa, hardware brevis
- [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Benson Muite
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Eliot Lear
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Benson Muite
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Bob Hinden
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Eric Rescorla
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Stephen Farrell
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Thomas "Eric" Brunner-Williams
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal andihavemilestogobeforeisleep
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Eliot Lear
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Ondřej Surý
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Benson Muite
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Noah .
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Benson Muite
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Dave Lawrence
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Andrew Alston
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Benson Muite
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Ondřej Surý
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Sorin Faibish
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Botir 4life
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal patrickreneguerrero@sudomail.com
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Melinda Shore
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [hackathon] One Tax API Hackathon proposal Charles Eckel (eckelcu)