Re: [hackathon] [abnf-discuss] Virtual formal languages meeting

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 27 April 2020 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F573A0775; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBs1yz6JU0IX; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3F1F3A0D34; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.67] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 03RFrvCd012480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:53:57 -0700
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: "hackathon@ietf.org" <hackathon@ietf.org>, "abnf-discuss@ietf.org" <abnf-discuss@ietf.org>, Stephen McQuistin <Stephen.McQuistin@glasgow.ac.uk>
References: <DE624911-80E3-4EF6-83E5-E41E9245DC47@glasgow.ac.uk> <67B64692-A404-4F22-B65D-6D4A2C7372E6@glasgow.ac.uk> <B7A45984-2BFD-431A-BFEB-C4A357A55646@glasgow.ac.uk> <6A2ECB4C-44B4-4DCF-9899-5B0BAA1D6E3D@tzi.org> <2b050320-94b5-55f6-8b0c-a0b070190724@dcrocker.net> <739C5291-1B6B-4E04-B0A7-B13F73DC4E20@tzi.org>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <4cc4db29-78a8-a0ec-644d-9adca8aa931e@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:52:02 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <739C5291-1B6B-4E04-B0A7-B13F73DC4E20@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hackathon/ToBVpCh3KFG7Yqz8jafM2thlQpg>
Subject: Re: [hackathon] [abnf-discuss] Virtual formal languages meeting
X-BeenThere: hackathon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion regarding past, present, and future IETF hackathons." <hackathon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hackathon>, <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hackathon/>
List-Post: <mailto:hackathon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon>, <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:52:40 -0000

On 4/27/2020 8:47 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2020-04-27, at 17:46, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>>
>> Presumably that's a comment on their service.  Which alternative would you find acceptable?
> 
> Any ethical one.


I am asking a logistics and operations question, not an ethical one.

What is a practical alternative that will allow the group to meet safely 
and easily and -- in technical terms, at least -- productively?

That's not intended to challenge your concern but simply to find an 
acceptable replacement.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net