[HAM-AG] Is DSTAR useful to anyone here?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 28 September 2020 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ham-ag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ham-ag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4E13A1429 for <ham-ag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EoNraqQndrrY for <ham-ag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B861C3A142A for <ham-ag@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 08SLoFPW050110 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <ham-ag@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:50:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1601329819; bh=4+Rf4gVJS4besKAK4D9StDFDQJEJvfoEU9e1Qkfk0Q4=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=S3E1iVLVpyJJg+tgkjqfW7I/8aWri+bC2A24v+8Ea7+LRnhmTBRsYx5EftrFh43E3 TFEGvXBLuhTRai1K6tT+Zl0v0+o1aCct8PVEKkwg0wNSjONtKlyJqTS1DcRiRhOwwv wTEb2rQtaUKBbKMCgSArTmqc9oy9dikfM7J+Erdk=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: ham-ag@ietf.org
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <52444780-738a-4273-8b29-f31b3f384426@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:50:14 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ham-ag/8iQY7cCj-9cNxomvp8B9O3wPZng>
Subject: [HAM-AG] Is DSTAR useful to anyone here?
X-BeenThere: ham-ag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: HAM Radio Operators Affiliate Group <ham-ag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ham-ag>, <mailto:ham-ag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ham-ag/>
List-Post: <mailto:ham-ag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ham-ag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ham-ag>, <mailto:ham-ag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 21:50:23 -0000

I picked up a DSTAR handset a few years ago, and outside doing the work 
to getting registered with a gateway and figure out handset's 
button-arcana, I have not used it.

There doesn't seem to be anything in going on in the DFW area that would 
draw me into using it (even if this was a hotbed area for its early years).

Am I missing something that I should be seeing locally?

Is anyone elsewhere really enjoying it?

Maybe someone wants this handset? (An Icom ID-51).

RjS