IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-evan-amateur-radio-ipv6

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Thu, 16 March 2023 06:06 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ham-ag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ham-ag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C22C151545; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OjZhjnwV1rMI; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C51C13AE47; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.132] (unknown [181.46.171.157]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05CD9280C04; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 03:06:10 -0300 (-03)
Message-ID: <b646036f-9e85-3643-9236-f202b666a474@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 03:06:06 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, Nick Harper <nharper@nharper.org>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 <ipv6@ietf.org>, ham-ag@ietf.org
References: <CAD=s3w5UUgiNC=SJxigAj7TS_QHDfk+KBiWq846rVcqmRxxtLQ@mail.gmail.com> <5420a784-0c57-e40f-3e45-dd3bd9c393ea@gmail.com> <CAF4+nEGh3J0wO7+9jcHoQErcW8=hXD+sh9DLJ7QWYUoBsmLAQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD=s3w6NFz4BA9_sdPukZQFQnS2h9yjP0ncYifX0HedOn_ZVPA@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEGGtRh20503VpCPjT2VdsaoDEbcfqSTumExHZEef2Jvvg@mail.gmail.com> <CACcvr=kc6kqPpdve8VWX5RWydtvjJkmEk+ykBvM6=SrUSVXWYQ@mail.gmail.com> <aaefbe19-ae80-fbef-5317-c17a7e18340d@gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <aaefbe19-ae80-fbef-5317-c17a7e18340d@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ham-ag/TnQRamiRD90gJqXvs6wplVf9szg>
Subject: Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-evan-amateur-radio-ipv6
X-BeenThere: ham-ag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: HAM Radio Operators Affiliate Group <ham-ag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ham-ag>, <mailto:ham-ag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ham-ag/>
List-Post: <mailto:ham-ag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ham-ag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ham-ag>, <mailto:ham-ag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 06:06:20 -0000

Hi, Alex,


On 17/2/23 17:04, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 16/02/2023 à 01:10, Nick Harper a écrit :
>> Why hash the callsign at all?
> 
> I think it is a good question.
> 
> There appears to be a need of having the callsign in IID. 

How is this need satisfied for IPv4?  ANd why should one announce 
identity to the world, rather than only where it is required?

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email