Re: [HASMAT] moving forward

Kai Engert <kaie@kuix.de> Mon, 23 August 2010 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <kaie@kuix.de>
X-Original-To: hasmat@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hasmat@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3A43A69D8 for <hasmat@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 03:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.743, BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oB9iXDK1sBx9 for <hasmat@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 03:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s15277822.onlinehome-server.info (s15277822.onlinehome-server.info [87.106.189.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783E03A67DB for <hasmat@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 03:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.11] (p4FF350F6.dip.t-dialin.net [79.243.80.246]) by s15277822.onlinehome-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ABBE56E97E; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:50:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C725267.3010908@kuix.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:50:15 +0200
From: Kai Engert <kaie@kuix.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100806 Fedora/3.1.2-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <4C6EC48A.5020803@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4C6EC48A.5020803@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hasmat@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [HASMAT] moving forward
X-BeenThere: hasmat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <hasmat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hasmat>, <mailto:hasmat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hasmat>
List-Post: <mailto:hasmat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hasmat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hasmat>, <mailto:hasmat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:49:46 -0000

  On 20.08.2010 20:08, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 3. Name. Some people have said that "HASMAT" isn't very descriptive of
> the subject matter, and that we might want something like "WEBSEC". As
> long as folks don't think "WEBSEC" means that we'd be working on
> everything under the sun related to the security of the web, I'd be fine
> with a name like that. Other suggestions are welcome.

"websec" sounds indeed very general, while the meaning of "hasmat" 
focuses on a smaller subset.

I wanted to propose "WebAppSec", but there's already 
http://www.webappsec.org/

What about HTSEC ? (hypertext security)

Kai