[hiaps] Side meeting

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05201A015F for <hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:50:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Wts-o4gBS6Y for <hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yh0-x22a.google.com (mail-yh0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D90711A000B for <hiaps@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:50:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yh0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b6so8558432yha.29 for <hiaps@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:50:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=2JMiBD1MMU2jqf5vRE/FFRvtsQV3jmMTUi20/NnjPKY=; b=YtV/ka6N9vidOi0Z9YKS55Zx0iRroRERGAM0uS/Vlce8MUZteKpYoPAZXOrwDeGmJy Q3AUQ9KBMfFJvmB/w0uQ1iiJx56KErpaM3rX/PMokUhIBRNpX41oYVDLPYfcHRZ1cA9H 4f1QkKUNOY/gJp1ggDr6MZkp/s0SeyRrCgAt30DmRppnvKDmtBTFm1rIc2w/hxxbGvIk AzwNJuFD/zJdb/AXw5+iJ96VZFfkGYcamnbGWyIRBoPbUpUPNpGcA+WtH10Yx54wy96P wfKzN+brnUviAiwBNEmTrSKcAJpgVpA/V8P5EH+P5wGWlzJJ1gXHivPoDjzKfH1CiFFH /jLQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.47.195 with SMTP id t43mr6922274yhb.33.1415929829204; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:50:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.71.198 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:50:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:50:29 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfXuFLdpCrmebfpo=9m0vFYWA1QGgYe_1+H3HW3ZnQoxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hiaps/6k5_a-1PqW_IuU5MYCLhqkn-taY
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "hiaps@ietf.org" <hiaps@ietf.org>, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>, Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com>, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
Subject: [hiaps] Side meeting
X-BeenThere: hiaps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Host Identification, Address and Prefix Sharing in Wi-Fi Access \(hiaps\)" <hiaps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hiaps>, <mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hiaps/>
List-Post: <mailto:hiaps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiaps>, <mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:50:32 -0000

 Hi all,

Regarding the side meeting, we had a chat with Dan Wing, Tiru, et al.
It seems like host id/address activity should better direct itself
towards out-of-band solutions rather than inband as discussed in RFC
6967.

Out-of-band solutions can avoid a lot of the issues IETF is concerned
about and may give us an opportunity to do consensus oriented work.

Of course the applicability of such an out-of-band solution could be a
bit limited but I think that the solution could be OK for most of the
use cases we have.

So I wanted to start a discussion on this direction.

Regards,

Behcet