Re: [hiaps] Draft Charter posted
joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 05 January 2014 19:26 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 459CE1AF5D2 for <hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 5 Jan 2014 11:26:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z3eiWNFUjDhK for
<hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 11:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E441AF5D3 for <hiaps@ietf.org>;
Sun, 5 Jan 2014 11:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mb-aye.local ([172.56.16.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by
nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s05JQIvh028889
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
Sun, 5 Jan 2014 19:26:21 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <52C9B1D4.9070109@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 11:26:12 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/27.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sarikaya@ieee.org, hiaps@ietf.org
References: <CAC8QAcfGK-41mSLx2VBxqVDzgm-a=7tGY448gYGRd2+OrGhr8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcfGK-41mSLx2VBxqVDzgm-a=7tGY448gYGRd2+OrGhr8A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="5OXCxK6r8CxK6eHXeV2LLNM9tPhxxB2qA"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:26:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
Subject: Re: [hiaps] Draft Charter posted
X-BeenThere: hiaps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Host Identification,
Address and Prefix Sharing in Wi-Fi Access \(hiaps\)" <hiaps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hiaps>,
<mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hiaps/>
List-Post: <mailto:hiaps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiaps>,
<mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:26:34 -0000
Such an identifier is not available in case of IPv4 connectivity when the hosts are behind a gateway using NAT or when the communication is tunneled such as using VPNs or IPSec In the emergency services context the presumption is that an ip address maps to a location in a a wire database, such that when you place this call the psap is informed of the location of the calling station. If no such mapping for the inner ip exists the utility of identfier seems of marginal utility does it not? it's one thing for carriers to report CPE mappings, and it seems to me quite another to expect useful information from a residential gateway, vpn tunnel termination device or the interior of an enterprise. On 1/2/14, 8:39 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > Hi all, > > We have posted the hiaps draft charter at: > > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart > > Please read it through. Give your comments, help us improve it. > > BTW, Happy New Year! > > Behcet > > > > _______________________________________________ > hiaps mailing list > hiaps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiaps >
- [hiaps] Draft Charter posted Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [hiaps] Draft Charter posted joel jaeggli
- Re: [hiaps] Draft Charter posted Roland.Schott
- Re: [hiaps] Draft Charter posted Behcet Sarikaya