[hiaps] request to consider sponsoring http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132181A0208; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:28:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J3tcQ4dnlqAA; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD91D1A01D5; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:28:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-bc23.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-bc23.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.188.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s26GSEtW024450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:28:16 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <5318A21D.7020508@bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:28:13 +0000
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/27.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "hiaps@ietf.org" <hiaps@ietf.org>, Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>, draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios@tools.ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HQOlmiSrS5jDkW94VX2kLapeIQ74C8JAV"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:28:17 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hiaps/_hO3xkoWkWWYIcaBEMSVh9P4xOE
Subject: [hiaps] request to consider sponsoring http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04
X-BeenThere: hiaps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Host Identification, Address and Prefix Sharing in Wi-Fi Access \(hiaps\)" <hiaps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hiaps>, <mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hiaps/>
List-Post: <mailto:hiaps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiaps>, <mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:28:39 -0000

Greetings int-area and hiaps-mailing-list folks,

I realize that this is midweek at the IETF, however this question is not
far from several discussions I've had this week.

I have been asked to consider AD sponsoring
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04

In the process of  considering doing so I'd like to get some input with
respect to:

A. The appetite for pursuing some or any of this work in existing
working groups, and in particular within the INT area.

B. A consensus basis for moving beyond RFC 6269 into active work in this
area.

C. How we address concerns raised by the IETF community expressed
through  draft-farrell-perpass-attack when evaluating scenarios and
beginning to address requirements and solution-space.

Obviously these are complex questions and I do not expect that we will
arrive at answers easily nor does work on this or other drafts depend on
answering them, however it's part of the dialog.

Thanks
joel