Re: [hiaps] Side meeting
Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 19:35 UTC
Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888591A8F44 for <hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:35:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B89-k9a4yqSq for <hiaps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:35:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 587131A8F40 for <hiaps@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:35:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id rl12so18767555iec.10 for <hiaps@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:35:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ctf5oab1+ifqwB5zNMlTxlBQPkxPiQu3K5MxEDurZUk=; b=HTNKBevGVMxikeclEdnnT8lm0tpttmFey0Z0zJ/AUT8nofZhelN1HMhR8d8+YmWkFc gibP9yQ4MHC3weKZB+9qJIFKfTbnf2NtZp0LGNN492hKNzWj3fPoXXra2JQojtngMKxV wZeMkO22o5jcK8uFuo0YLOccqPkmpkuGXWOYSP5cB0Y9I/El4M6uMoZfPQK4Jvkn6dha IvJIzNLcFHW5w1rPRjWQkBE+RQhqD4w2uM2fRCvqe567SeTJEC8nMoCROWAfE1ME+rGp E4f+a8qIN/qCIkutrWuLZbSvkb+fzsQQ0osAQgBAD7DGZZAdHEqMmEdTuvRxdBVyNO+P yu3w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.111.226 with SMTP id il2mr8308938igb.10.1415993741629; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:35:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.107.40.17 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:35:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <A7B344F1-916E-45F4-9B4D-A7A9EE40DAB8@cisco.com>
References: <CAC8QAcfXuFLdpCrmebfpo=9m0vFYWA1QGgYe_1+H3HW3ZnQoxg@mail.gmail.com> <A7B344F1-916E-45F4-9B4D-A7A9EE40DAB8@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:35:41 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAceyc=d-E2P4p6nxxOHk_D0w63tCsAQGsgT91Zj3a5wEEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: 🔓Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hiaps/ht0H-DHhxQvTSSDLb04brLqD2u8
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "hiaps@ietf.org" <hiaps@ietf.org>, Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com>, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
Subject: Re: [hiaps] Side meeting
X-BeenThere: hiaps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Host Identification, Address and Prefix Sharing in Wi-Fi Access \(hiaps\)" <hiaps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hiaps>, <mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hiaps/>
List-Post: <mailto:hiaps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiaps>, <mailto:hiaps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:35:44 -0000
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:29 PM, 🔓Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> wrote: > > On Nov 13, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Regarding the side meeting, we had a chat with Dan Wing, Tiru, et al. >> It seems like host id/address activity should better direct itself >> towards out-of-band solutions rather than inband as discussed in RFC >> 6967. > > RFC6967 describes an out-of-band mechanism in its Section 4.9, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6967#section-4.9 > Yes. The discussion is too ident centric and ident is tcp based. I think there is a lot to do in this area. Regards, Behcet > -d > >> Out-of-band solutions can avoid a lot of the issues IETF is concerned >> about and may give us an opportunity to do consensus oriented work. >> >> Of course the applicability of such an out-of-band solution could be a >> bit limited but I think that the solution could be OK for most of the >> use cases we have. >> >> So I wanted to start a discussion on this direction. >> >> Regards, >> >> Behcet >
- [hiaps] Side meeting Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [hiaps] Side meeting 🔓Dan Wing
- Re: [hiaps] Side meeting Behcet Sarikaya