Re: [HICCUP] Any interest?

Ken, you phrased the challenge quite well.

Another problem is that there isn't a detailed description of the 
planned work available.

Good luck!

Ciao
Hannes

ken carlberg wrote:
> While your intentions are probably fair, I feel your line of reasoning 
> will not go far in advancing HICCUP in the IETF beyond a mailing list.
>
> If there are some distinct and succinct problem(s) you think need to 
> be addressed, please feel free to bring them up.  I would also 
> recommend trying to present your thoughts beyond a specific 
> customer/client and/or a private network.  Work in the IETF should not 
> be something that would only apply to an RFP.
>
> regards,
>
> -ken
>
>
> On Jul 25, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Kantawala, Anshul wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I was hoping there would be enough interest for a BOF in Chicago, but 
>> that didn't happen.  HICCUP is also highly relevant for military 
>> networks and thus I would presume there would be good support from 
>> defense contractors and other companies supporting DoD networks.
>>
>> Hope we can generate enough interest to at least hold a BOF during 
>> the next IETF meeting.  Also, in the interim, maybe we could start 
>> trying to put together a draft outlining the problem space?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Anshul Kantawala
>> Lockheed Martin, IS&GS
>> 301-240-7539
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HICCUP mailing list
>> HICCUP@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiccup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HICCUP mailing list
> HICCUP@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiccup

_______________________________________________
HICCUP mailing list
HICCUP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiccup