Re: [Hipsec] submission of a new I-D:"Delivering Geographic Location in Host Identity Protocol (HIP)"

Hi Feng,
One comment with respect of the parameter geolocation. In the location-based services, the location can be identified by the LOCATOR which is defined in RFC5206, it can also provide the privacy and authentication. So what's the preference of the GEOLOCATION comparing with the LOCATOR?

Best Regards,
Suping
---original message---
From: fcao@cisco.com
Sent: 2008-10-22 10:21:00
Subject:[Hipsec] submission of a new I-D:"Delivering Geographic Location	in Host Identity Protocol (HIP)"

>Hi all,
> 
>A new I-D, draft-cao-hip-geolocation-00, was just submitted to IETF HIP
>WG. Your comments are always welcome.
> 
>Here is the staging URL for now: 
>http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/staging/draft-cao-hip-geolocation-00.tx
>t
><http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/staging/draft-cao-hip-geolocation-00.t
>xt> 
>
>Abstract: This document defines a new parameter for delivering
>geographic location in Host Identity Protocol (HIP). For mobile users
>using HIP, one generic mechanism is proposed to share or update their
>geo- location information with either rendezvous servers or their peers.
>In addition, geo-location privacy is also protected with the help of the
>ENCRYPTED parameter.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--Feng
>_______________________________________________
>Hipsec mailing list
>Hipsec@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec