[hiprg] Using FNV for HIT generation in DEX
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Wed, 06 April 2011 00:21 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hiprg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiprg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1253A69A6 for <hiprg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KmVo-CRmz+9G for <hiprg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013303A69A5 for <hiprg@irtf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C2562AC4 for <hiprg@irtf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 00:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAPHJ4l3re8U for <hiprg@irtf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:22:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (host-78-64-7-227.homerun.telia.com [78.64.7.227]) (Authenticated sender: rgm@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AED162A9E for <hiprg@irtf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:22:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4D9BB251.6010006@htt-consult.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 02:22:41 +0200
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "hiprg@irtf.org" <hiprg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [hiprg] Using FNV for HIT generation in DEX
X-BeenThere: hiprg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Host Identity Protocol \(HIP\) Research Group" <hiprg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/hiprg>
List-Post: <mailto:hiprg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:21:41 -0000
As I mentioned in my presentation, the method I have in DEX for HIT generation is a placeholder until I either determine it is a good method or I find something else that does not raise the 'cost' of DEX. Well at SAAG last week, Eastlake presented FNV: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-eastlake-fnv-00.txt Does anyone have a cost and cpu cost for FNV? Or opinions about it? Or should I use one of the AES hashes out there?
- [hiprg] Using FNV for HIT generation in DEX Robert Moskowitz