[Hipsec-rg] About simultaneous mobility to HIP

john.zhao at huawei.com (John.zhao) Thu, 31 July 2008 13:06 UTC

From: "john.zhao at huawei.com"
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:06:29 +0100
Subject: [Hipsec-rg] About simultaneous mobility to HIP
Message-ID: <0K4V00640GEWP1@szxml01-in.huawei.com>

    See my comments inline.

======= 2008-07-31 14:03:00 You have said:=======

>
>Hi all,
>
>I've commented to John in private that the use of DHT or Hi3 (or even
>fast enough DynDNS) could help in simultaneous mobility.
[John.zhao]Agree. Currently , there are some much mature technolgoy can be used to review the resolution of this problem. But whatever is used, I mean among RVS,DHT or Hi3 etc, it seems that a fixed or respective fixed entity is need and the key to this case. So , it is similiar from this perspective. If that can be considered some harmonized and output one guideline as detail as possible for deployment?
>
>If I recall right, earlier revisions of rvs or mm drafts used to have
>extensive flow charts for various mobility scenarios but were removed
>later for simplicity/lack of interest. Might be useful to check history
>at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-mm-00
[John.zhao]Just checked with those historic version. All version said the specific solution is out of scope.Although all of them mention about it and also mention about RVS solution to it.
>
>Andrei
>
>| ======= 2008-07-31 21:46:00 You have said:=======
>|
>|> This is what the concept of a Rendezvous Server is intended to solve.
>|> The (perhaps undocumented) idea is that a host should maintain
>|> connectivity to one such that is unlikely to move, and to advertise
>|> its locator as a potential rendezvous point.
>| [John.zhao] Agree from my opinion. But is it ok? And how about the
>detail chart flow? Is it should be and can be standarded as a doc at
>now? After all , without a document, something is uncertain.
>|> Andrew
>|>
>|> On 31/07/2008, at 9:32 PM, John.zhao wrote:
>|>
>|>> Hi,folks
>|>>
>|>> 	After take a look about current docs located in hip wg and hip rg.
>|>> I didn't find the document to describe how to resolve the
>|>> simultaneous mobility problem aimed to hip. If anyone have some
>|>> clues , hope can be shared.
>|>> 	If not,is it ok to start it?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
	Best Rgds,
Thanks,

John.zhao