[hiprg] Fwd: [irsg] Results of IETF-conflict review for <draft-irtf-hip-experiment-14.txt>

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Tue, 08 November 2011 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: hiprg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiprg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D23F21F85B8; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:16:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.18
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.18 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.380, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DOj9lHUzbzYB; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:16:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-da02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B370C21F84BA; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com []) by mgw-da02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pA8EGMBd004763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:16:24 +0200
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ABCC75CD-B2A5-445E-92A8-9448E78508AF"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:16:16 +0200
References: <20111107232910.11138.49665.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: hiprg@irtf.org
Message-Id: <4946C5B8-291E-4B21-81B3-0E85AACA8C91@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mail.fit.nokia.com); Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:16:16 +0200 (EET)
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: Internet Research Steering Group <irsg@irtf.org>
Subject: [hiprg] Fwd: [irsg] Results of IETF-conflict review for <draft-irtf-hip-experiment-14.txt>
X-BeenThere: hiprg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Host Identity Protocol \(HIP\) Research Group" <hiprg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/hiprg>
List-Post: <mailto:hiprg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:16:27 -0000

Hi, authors,

please let your chairs and myself know if any of the IESG comments will result in a new revision or need to be communicated to the RFC Editor otherwise.


Begin forwarded message:

> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> Subject: [irsg] Results of IETF-conflict review for <draft-irtf-hip-experiment-14.txt>
> Date: November 8, 2011 1:29:10 GMT+02:00
> To: IRSG <irsg@irtf.org>
> Cc: <iana@iana.org>rg>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>rg>, <ietf-announce@ietf.org>rg>, <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> The IESG has completed a review of <draft-irtf-hip-experiment-14.txt> consistent with RFC5742. 
> This review is applied to all non-IETF streams.
> The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'HIP Experiment Report'
> <draft-irtf-hip-experiment-14.txt> as an Informational RFC.
> The IESG would also like the IRSG to review the comments in
> the datatracker
> (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-hip-experiment/) related to
> this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into
> the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the comment log.
> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-hip-experiment/
> The process for such documents is described at
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html
> Thank you,
> The IESG Secretary
> Technical Summary
>   This document is a report from the IRTF HIP research group
>   documenting the collective experiences and lessons learned from
>   studies, related experimentation, and designs completed by the
>   research group.  The documents summarizes implications of adding HIP
>   to host protocol stacks, Internet infrastructure, and applications.
>   The perspective of a network operator, as well as a list of HIP
>   experiments, are presented as well.
> Working Group Summary
>   This document is a product of the IRTF and is in RFC 5742 review
>   by the IESG.
> Document Quality
>   N/A
> Personnel
>   Tom Henderson <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com> is the
>   Document Shepherd.  Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
>   is the Responsible AD.
> IESG Note
>   The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done
>   in the hip Working Group, but this relationship does not prevent
>   publishing.