[hiprg] draft-irtf-hip-experiment-10 review
Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com> Mon, 28 February 2011 16:54 UTC
Return-Path: <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
X-Original-To: hiprg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiprg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4723A6C35 for <hiprg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:54:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6PlP4Xzs+OJz for <hiprg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:54:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.nomadiclab.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400:101::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08CB3A6C2E for <hiprg@irtf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:54:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3416A4E6E5; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:55:49 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nomadiclab.com
Received: from gw.nomadiclab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inside.nomadiclab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j4as+mim9oSw; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:55:48 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gw.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02DF4E6E4; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:55:48 +0200 (EET)
From: Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:55:48 +0200
Message-Id: <A7C7A8B4-FE51-4471-9674-0A5AC54CCC6B@nomadiclab.com>
To: hiprg@irtf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Subject: [hiprg] draft-irtf-hip-experiment-10 review
X-BeenThere: hiprg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Host Identity Protocol \(HIP\) Research Group" <hiprg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/hiprg>
List-Post: <mailto:hiprg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:54:53 -0000
Hi, I finally managed to have look at the experiment report doc. Here's some comments and nits: 1.1. What is HIP? Could mention that Standards Track work has been started (in the end of the section). 1.2. Scope During the timeframe of this report (2004-09), s/09/2011/ 2.3.8. Interactions with host firewalls When using HIP over UDP, the host needs to open just port 10500 in practice. This seems to imply that inbound unsolicited packets to 10500 would be needed, which is not the case as long as ICE is used (except for the HIP relay server). I'd rather say something like "the firewall needs to allow outbound UDP packets and responses to them". Cheers, Ari
- [hiprg] draft-irtf-hip-experiment-10 review Ari Keranen
- Re: [hiprg] draft-irtf-hip-experiment-10 review Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [hiprg] draft-irtf-hip-experiment-10 review Ari Keranen