Re: [hiprg] About the HIP DEX draft (draft-moskowitz-hip-rg-dex-04)

Juho Vähä-Herttua <juho.vaha-herttua@tkk.fi> Sat, 05 February 2011 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <juho.vaha-herttua@tkk.fi>
X-Original-To: hiprg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiprg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA693A6A65 for <hiprg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:10:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.119
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.819]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DLFC1R135NCm for <hiprg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:10:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kirsi2.inet.fi (mta-out.inet.fi [195.156.147.13]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46713A696F for <hiprg@irtf.org>; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:10:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.vaha-herttua.fi (88.192.254.58) by kirsi2.inet.fi (8.5.133) id 4D073504029A7BBE; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 00:10:23 +0200
Received: from [85.78.163.28] (GZYKMMMCMXXVIII.gprs.sl-laajakaista.fi [85.78.163.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.vaha-herttua.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D04051FD01; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 00:10:53 +0200 (EET)
References: <15612_1296833191_ZZ0LG300AOYMW5I9.00_4D4C1A94.3010908@htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <15612_1296833191_ZZ0LG300AOYMW5I9.00_4D4C1A94.3010908@htt-consult.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <C916B931-C001-4456-AAF4-42E6A99E69CB@tkk.fi>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Juho_V=C3=A4h=C3=A4-Herttua?= <juho.vaha-herttua@tkk.fi>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 00:10:12 +0200
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 05:41:23 -0800
Cc: "hiprg@irtf.org" <hiprg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [hiprg] About the HIP DEX draft (draft-moskowitz-hip-rg-dex-04)
X-BeenThere: hiprg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Host Identity Protocol \(HIP\) Research Group" <hiprg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/hiprg>
List-Post: <mailto:hiprg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 08:05:02 -0000

On 4.2.2011, at 17.26, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> wrote:
> Section 5.1:
> "For the BEX parameters, DIFFIE_HELMAN, DH_GROUP_LIST, and HOST_ID, only
> the ECC values are valid in DEX."
> 
> Suggestion:
> "For the BEX parameters, DIFFIE_HELLMAN, DH_GROUP_LIST, and HOST_ID,
> only the ECC values are valid in DEX."

Correction to this, the suggestion should be:

"For the BEX parameters, DH_GROUP_LIST, and HOST_ID, only the ECC values are valid in DEX."

I suppose the DIFFIE_HELLMAN was supposed to be removed earlier together with the parameter, but it was missed because of the typo.

Any comments and corrections to my misunderstandings are welcome. Please keep me in cc since I'm not on the list.


Juho