[Hipsec-rg] Hierarchical HITs
oleg.ponomarev at hiit.fi (Oleg Ponomarev) Thu, 15 January 2009 17:58 UTC
From: "oleg.ponomarev at hiit.fi"
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:58:29 +0200
Subject: [Hipsec-rg] Hierarchical HITs
In-Reply-To: <f832b2de31429.31429f832b2de@huawei.com>
References: <f808bd0c3515b.3515bf808bd0c@huawei.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901131526540.17180@stargazer.pc.infrahip.net> <f832b2de31429.31429f832b2de@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901151939590.17180@stargazer.pc.infrahip.net>
Hi! On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, JiangSheng 66104 wrote: > Yes, when one change networks, it need to get a different HIP management > domain, even maybe generate a new HIT based on the new HIP management > domain. So this will bind me to one provider forever? > However, other mechanisms may be used to support the usage of permanent > user HITs, mechanisms similar to support CoA and HA in mobile IP > senarios. Or just use mobile IP for this purpose? >> "For each single looking up operation, one may search through most of >> the database, on average, O(number of total global HITs)." >> >> Did you mean O(log2(number of HITs)) time, which makes max O(100)? > > I actaully refer to the worst senarios, assuming the HIT is stored > disorderly in the data base. Why is it the worst one? What if I use another bad implementation and get O(2^(number of HITs))? P.S. [my basic degree is in math] The number of HITs is finite, therefore O(number of total global HITs) equals to O(1) -- Regards, Oleg.
- [Hipsec-rg] Hierarchical HITs Xu Xiaohu
- [Hipsec-rg] Hierarchical HITs Oleg Ponomarev
- [Hipsec-rg] reverse DNS lookups of HITs Henderson, Thomas R
- [Hipsec-rg] Hierarchical HITs (Was: reverse DNS l… Varjonen Samu
- [Hipsec-rg] Hierarchical HITs (Was: reverse DNS l… JiangSheng 66104
- [Hipsec-rg] reverse DNS lookups of HITs JiangSheng 66104
- [Hipsec-rg] reverse DNS lookups of HITs Henderson, Thomas R
- [Hipsec-rg] Hierarchical HITs (Was: reverse DNS l… Oleg Ponomarev
- [Hipsec-rg] reverse DNS lookups of HITs JiangSheng 66104