[Hipsec-rg] About simultaneous mobility to HIP

xuxh at huawei.com (xuxiaohu 41208) Thu, 31 July 2008 11:25 UTC

From: "xuxh at huawei.com"
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:25:35 +0100
Subject: [Hipsec-rg] About simultaneous mobility to HIP
In-Reply-To: <48919C08.5070702@cs.helsinki.fi>
References: <0K4V00E8P847QD@szxml02-in.huawei.com> <48919C08.5070702@cs.helsinki.fi>
Message-ID: <fa0dbec352db.52dbfa0dbec3@huawei.com>

> 
> I've commented to John in private that the use of DHT or Hi3 (or even
> fast enough DynDNS) could help in simultaneous mobility.

Hi all,

I have made a presentation of HRA(Hierarchical Routing Architecture) on the HIPRG session this Monday, but no comment received up to now.

The major differece between HRA and HIP is that HRA uses a hierarchical and cryptographic hash identifier which is composed of Administrative Domain (AD) ID and a hash of the ADID and the public key. It looks like CGA. However, the AD ID, which embeds organization semantics,is only routable on the ID/locator mapping system which is realized by Hierarchical DHT. The main purposes are 1)Enforce organization-level access control policy 2)Overc
ome the lack of economic&trust model in the id/locator mapping system for the flat identifier.

I wonder whether the flat HIT is good enough in the DHT or Hi3 overlay from different perspectives.

Any comment is welcomed.

Xiaohu XU