[Hipsec-rg] meeting minutes posted

oleg.ponomarev at hiit.fi (Oleg Ponomarev) Wed, 07 January 2009 14:58 UTC

From: "oleg.ponomarev at hiit.fi"
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:58:10 +0200
Subject: [Hipsec-rg] meeting minutes posted
In-Reply-To: <77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6D07B0BBE5@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6D07B0BBE5@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901071641330.12787@stargazer.pc.infrahip.net>

Greetings!

> BM: Bob is working on moving HIP onto the standards track.  ADs are 
> looking at the HIPWG charter to address RFC5201 IESG concerns, and to 
> advance BEET. The big concern in 5201 is crypto agility, there are some 
> issues there. There will be a call for proposals on addressing crypto 
> agility concerns without making the protocol too heavy.  Please look at 
> those issues.

SHA1 is used now as a hash function to get HITSs, but are there any plans 
to phase out its use in favor of the SHA-2 variants? I was just wondering 
what happens in case of a HIT collision, since the complexity of an 
existing attack[1] is only 2**63.

Actually it would be useful to have IPv6 address space reserved for HIP 
only, then we could have ip6.arpa pointers etc


[1] http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/08/new_cryptanalyt.html

-- 
Regards, Oleg.