Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS
"Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com> Wed, 19 January 2011 05:43 UTC
Return-Path: <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3AD3A70CA for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:43:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mm1vQFHVMNDc for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com (slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com [130.76.64.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1DF3A70C9 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (stl-av-01.boeing.com [192.76.190.6]) by slb-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/8.14.4/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id p0J5kGKj009086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id p0J5kGp1015969 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:46:16 -0600 (CST)
Received: from XCH-NWHT-02.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-02.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.70.248]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id p0J5kFYo015943 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK) for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:46:15 -0600 (CST)
Received: from XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.85]) by XCH-NWHT-02.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.70.248]) with mapi; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:46:14 -0800
From: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
To: "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:46:14 -0800
Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS
Thread-Index: Acu3AoI0DxMExnEhQieFY8qDkinFHwAmZxDw
Message-ID: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CED25ACE0@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <4D3449E3.50904@ericsson.com> <1486BB76-57BF-49A9-85A0-8136C6EC2 55F@cs.rwth-aachen.de> <4D355F0B.8080305@ericsson.com> <F4B69051-1157-403D- 93BB-F09EA557C408@nomadiclab.com><B472C1B3-4B7E-4088-AFAD-D5AFF3F6A0E0@cs.rwth-aachen.de> <4D3578A7.8000101@hiit.fi>
In-Reply-To: <4D3578A7.8000101@hiit.fi>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 05:43:46 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Samu Varjonen > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:25 AM > To: hipsec@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS > > On 18/01/11 13:22, Tobias Heer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Am 18.01.2011 um 11:21 schrieb Ari Keranen: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'd go for publishing experimental CERT now and bis'ed PS version > later with the rest of the PS HIP stuff. > >> > > I second that. I think it makes sense to publish the RFC as > experimental first. > > > > The draft is a companion document for 5201 (not bis). > > I think it should be published as experimental right now. However, I > think we might consider a non-experimental version in the future (when > 5201-bis is done). > > > > Tobias > > > > +1 > +1 - Tom
- [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Samu Varjonen
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Gonzalo Camarillo