[Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-13: (with COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 14 September 2016 22:18 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB396127A90; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.33.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147389153065.29849.8209733472001539786.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:18:50 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/0Vvo7LEaQO4TcMXlw0sFBivw1oE>
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis@ietf.org
Subject: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 22:18:51 -0000
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- My review was based on the diff vs. 5206 [1], and turned up nothing new of note:-) Seems like a reasonable update to me. I do however agree about the privacy issue raised by Mirja wrt exposing locators. It is worth noting that, so that implementers have it flagged that they need to consider that - not doing so caused quite a fuss for WebRTC so better to not repeat that. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc5206&url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-13.txt
- [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Tom Henderson
- Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Stephen Farrell