IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] Status of our next batch

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Thu, 31 March 2016 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F179112D1CF for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qNR3VxmLOSAQ for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DDAC12D18D for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79d86d000005b69-1f-56fd37d84ffc
Received: from ESESSHC011.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.51]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E7.60.23401.8D73DF65; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:44:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [148.135.149.145] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:44:11 +0200
To: Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1601312159110.17573@hymn02.u.washington.edu> <56B36901.1030407@ericsson.com>
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <56FD37BB.1090907@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:44:11 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56B36901.1030407@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7se4N879hBov7tC2mLprMbDHz/EE2 ByaPJUt+Mnm0XI8JYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgymh6YlPwTKhiwu7zLA2MG/m7GDk5JARMJL78 +MUGYYtJXLi3Hsjm4hASOMIosfrNfShnLaPE1QdTWECqhAX0JLZdn8QOYosI6EhcerGFFcQW EsiWuHD3JVgNs4CkxPJNEFPZBCwktty6DxbnFdCW+LJyI1icRUBV4tmM32C9ogIxEsffnWOE qBGUODnzCVA9Bwcn0Pze5XIQIw0kjiyawwphy0s0b53NDLFWW2L5sxaWCYyCs5B0z0LSMgtJ ywJG5lWMosWpxcW56UZGeqlFmcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgaF6cMtvqx2MB587HmIU4GBU4uFd0PIn TIg1say4MvcQowQHs5II7ymzv2FCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGKU5WJTEedk+XQ4TEkhPLEnN Tk0tSC2CyTJxcEo1MJpMXSNW3Del5WmgaoKFS9953Y+zrryU6VvNzbxSdM3bE00tt7bVH+Fc HFy6MUOO1TS2Qeq7ZkLyo9uzGn631N206Wa4JPDSaPqV+Z6bt9ywW6Af/0zf3NNa9+Cj+OX6 p+Q++BzU8ph0+lbL9EWrmG8W11pnnHjVmflQQW/VjQ0GgVXTFrROzVBiKc5INNRiLipOBAB6 RIFqUQIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/2dC_tt3A5g0SGcTRc_IGekjbz6k>
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of our next batch
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:44:45 -0000

Hi Tom,

what is the status of the multihoming draft? When do you think you will
get around to submitting a version that is ready for WGLC?

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 04/02/2016 5:06 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> thanks for the update. We will wait until you get around to revising the
> multihoming draft as well and then we will WGLC them together.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> On 01/02/2016 7:59 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/17/2015 11:52 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>> Authors of the following drafts,
>>>
>>> could you please let the WG know their status and what needs to happen
>>> next for each of them in order to be able to WGLC them at some point in
>>> the future?
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming/
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>
>> Gonzalo and all,
>>
>> Here is a brief update on the mobility and multihoming drafts. I posted a revision 10 of RFC5206-bis last week:
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-10.txt
>>
>> I believe that we could close all the remaining open issues as either resolved or wontfix (editorial); the changes that appear in draft-10 are as follows:
>> - issue 21: clarified that HI MAY be included in UPDATE
>> for benefit of middleboxes
>> - changed one informative reference from RFC 4423-bis to RFC 7401
>> - removed discussion about possible multiple LOCATOR_SET
>> and ESP_INFO parameters in an UPDATE (per previous
>> mailing list discussion)
>> - removed discussion about handling LOCATOR_SET parameters in packets
>> other than UPDATE (per previous mailing list discussion)
>>
>> I had hoped to post a revision of the multihoming draft with all of the open issues resolved by now, but there is still some work for me to do, so I just refreshed the previous version for the time being:
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-07.txt
>>
>> I will work on publishing -08 shortly and then I think we could consider a WGLC on the pair of drafts.
>>
>> - Tom
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email