IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] Status of our next batch

Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> Sun, 13 December 2015 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490461A8863 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:30:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdsyVL_45gPB for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64B9A1A886F for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:30:23 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79296d00000141d-a6-566df17da795
Received: from ESESSHC019.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.75]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AB.F8.05149.D71FD665; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:30:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB205.ericsson.se ([169.254.5.115]) by ESESSHC019.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:30:20 +0100
From: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] Status of our next batch
Thread-Index: AQHRNfXZ/csMZFBSyEm4WmroYUfKAQ==
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:30:19 +0000
Message-ID: <D7780678-2AF8-4639-B456-C54FCB0CC130@ericsson.com>
References: <564C2E26.5030609@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <564C2E26.5030609@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <C7C1D6886AD31C42AB6CF33CEB84FC77@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprKIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7t27tx9wwg6kzpS2mLprM7MDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujNdLvAuecVS8X/KTpYFxKXsXIyeHhICJxKLjy9ggbDGJC/fW A9lcHEIChxkl1rd/gXKWMEo0f/jKAlLFJmAvMXnNR0YQW0TAV2LShGdg3cwCahLLfuxkArGF BfQktl2fxA5Roy8xY/taFghbT6J73lFWEJtFQFXi4+/fYHFeoJlTb65gBrGFBLQl+hZsBarh 4OAU0JHY+DsJJMwIdNz3U2uYIFaJS9x6Mp8J4mgBiSV7zjND2KISLx//Y4WwlSRWbL/ECFGv J3Fj6hSoM60lvh86CWVrSyxb+JoZ4gRBiZMzn7BMYBSfhWTFLCTts5C0z0LSPgtJ+wJG1lWM osWpxUm56UZGeqlFmcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgZF1cMtvgx2ML587HmIU4GBU4uE1OJAbJsSaWFZc mXuIUYKDWUmEt+80UIg3JbGyKrUoP76oNCe1+BCjNAeLkjhvM9ODUCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpgs EwenVAOjesGVzxJmbtuVOYS/PMiV9H02izlpS+DmU9wOZrf7NnG0ict//fhjS1hxlaNlk+Li 8BhjjrXPpBT/PZ5wZD2XzQae545TP5jIrpLyvl1c/+X86eOVOY0hfsyPnjLbv+VWmJDHFfqs g/+VV+yVGdzfXngY1wUKssr2dwZ9ZF1Q7XNmHZ/4nb9KLMUZiYZazEXFiQD4JF/FqAIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/4pT9lNADbfL3E5I-b8AuAtcodlk>
Cc: Jan Melen <jan.melen@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of our next batch
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:30:26 -0000

Hi,

We were thinking of adding a bit more details on the relaying part of the native NAT traversal draft, but after giving it bit more though, probably that is not necessary. We will do final review for the draft to make sure it is aligned with the rest of the documents, but after that, we should be good to go forward with the WGLC.


Cheers,
Ari

> On 18 Nov 2015, at 08:52, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Authors of the following drafts,
> 
> could you please let the WG know their status and what needs to happen
> next for each of them in order to be able to WGLC them at some point in
> the future?
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email