Re: [Hipsec] Parameter space layout and significant change in wording
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Tue, 03 August 2010 15:18 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9673A6952 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 08:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.290, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZb1gqD3SRRT for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 08:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE5A3A693B for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 08:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3415968B27; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:08:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZrzehbMXkczo; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:08:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (h155.home.htt [208.83.67.155]) (Authenticated sender: rgm@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06F7168B45; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:08:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C58331D.4060307@htt-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:17:49 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <661EB84D-5466-4893-BA7D-1A9A4B73F4CC@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
In-Reply-To: <661EB84D-5466-4893-BA7D-1A9A4B73F4CC@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: HIP WG <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Parameter space layout and significant change in wording
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:18:05 -0000
On 07/29/2010 01:29 PM, Tobias Heer wrote: > Hi! > > We were discussing the parameter space layout during the 5201-bis discussion session. > The result was the following. I marked the changes with "!" > > 0 - 1023 Handshake > 1024 - 2047 Reserved > ! 2048 - 8191 Signed parameters allocated through specification documents* > ! 8192 - 61439 Reserved > ! 61440 - 62463 Signatures and (signed) MACs > ! 62464 - 63487 Parameters that are neither signed nor MACed* > 63488 - 64511 Rendezvous and relaying > ! 64512 - 65023 Parameters that not signed* > ! 65024 - 65535 Reserved > I was involved in the discussion to set this up and am in agreement with the numbering scheme. I ask all authors that have HIP Parameters in their documents to PLEASE review this and make any adjustments needed going forward. I will point ot that we are reving the version number. These HIP packets will be version 2. I will be making any needed adjustments in 5201-bis along with Tobias, and changing HIP DEX. > The rationale behind the changes was to have a non-BEX block and reserved blocks for future expansion in all vital spaces. The parts marked with * are the sub-spaces that are intended for extensions, etc. that do not strictly extend or modify the handshake. Any comments or objections? > > > IMPORTANT: > There is a slight change in wording to make creating HIP derivatives without signature less complex. I changed the "Signatures and MACs" to "Signatures and (signed) MACs" and "Parameters that are not signed" to "Parameters that are neither signed nor MACed". This will not change anything in the BEX (most importantly it will stay SIGMA compliant) but it avoids redefinition of parameters with different parameter numbers for DEX and other variants without signature capabilities. This is to allow a movement towards a "family" of interoperable HIP protocols. I would appreciate discussion and comments on this step on the list. > > BR, > > Tobias > > >
- [Hipsec] Parameter space layout and significant c… Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Parameter space layout and significa… Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] Parameter space layout and significa… Robert Moskowitz