Re: [Hipsec] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-30: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com> Sun, 05 April 2020 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <miika.komu@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E203A08F6; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 06:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oLatH-XHGRTq; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 06:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr80055.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.8.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650333A08F5; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 06:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Xlv1qQqwNijnVKXMqKfkjNwueYJQX4I9kDMRELmtYJsFPanYQdVrenVZyBjyu5+X04RKyZAMHZ3zhIya/7fHWss0Q6kCuY0tZC9esmXAvzkQ5t0A143T6S5ZDqkShJVIF/NEbG7/0hYszuSPda/lTWAD3sPAr7Upm2DofgHdiISvSmVaOgQ8msn29tCQKKZhVjxyjE1CUoZkfuytKUXhIB/sTsqElpBF+xTdD0s/oZabkDfso+FLhWikLBSBQeRkkCWHNEe4oLxCz979iDlfLOb1MtVFnYC23dgFlMtW1Upr2AFrmNxlTYWefc5CtAV3FEpOVjP3IF8D3oK/DH7u8w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CLUCyVGbvtr8XITnGe1l9FlaiLet/4JmIkcRnMrlpKg=; b=lfj/P8FwwtVu7HAUnB6Y5abYLqfBGX6C9GeX7buVpz8+AqNe/5gmTN8mUvFl5TIMmEB6BvNH6lFD2df6jBCoglpi1nf7pT61QKhSSxmsz1BrPBtnrdoxvs3zr5Hdp55nqQudqK+7Uq4wn30799PHCik01XjPyn69VEqS9M7VAs3W5IjgTM3us9tF6tXs48J1/CFxZ/aAThCld/mYon2oTp+TdeS3gFchAGyJRMyLASWznM0nV4XeLHRU6Xem7/xlTZ6OsYfIINxvrSTKEqhM+OTXo5OZHs2njY/SWRPl6oksKFo1mptlOvIdpysGI04i8IN2esjw4Ba2I0zkywZBqw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CLUCyVGbvtr8XITnGe1l9FlaiLet/4JmIkcRnMrlpKg=; b=Y6hqA5vtbulhRPmOAeh0L04PwtP7WFcgks300hiocFQL3kQTK4SXh9huue1vw4Lrr7nwnBoLy0417HPKTJQ+PR2Cr0/TLnS3yIjz9uQMfLmI4Ki5yJlm/EbK8zQUN25TLpSDXjrmTA5qPu5shAc9p/2c0qmOodYBGkuQDStgymY=
Received: from AM0PR07MB3876.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.134.81.144) by AM0PR07MB4516.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.135.152.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2900.12; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:25:11 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB3876.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5c87:eedc:6e84:fd4]) by AM0PR07MB3876.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5c87:eedc:6e84:fd4%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2900.012; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:25:11 +0000
From: Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>
To: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal@ietf.org>, "hip-chairs@ietf.org" <hip-chairs@ietf.org>, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>, "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-30: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHV8t5gg3Zvxq1PeEaWx2XZsfEZi6hma8SAgADf0gCAA2nvAA==
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:25:10 +0000
Message-ID: <bfc25c0732d99dbafc987bf5745a2a58be1dcaf3.camel@ericsson.com>
References: <158340648969.14566.11476213026719970345@ietfa.amsl.com> <ef83276e8b16e138f08b19747c54977989bcc1d8.camel@ericsson.com> <326b5dfa75824f82e990b4b990c51accbfbf4d72.camel@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <326b5dfa75824f82e990b4b990c51accbfbf4d72.camel@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: fi-FI, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=miika.komu@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [88.148.205.35]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cf9e2cc9-f1c2-417c-2470-08d7d964c460
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB4516:|AM0PR07MB4516:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR07MB45162F4C8270C49A44BD42B0FCC50@AM0PR07MB4516.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 03648EFF89
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM0PR07MB3876.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(54906003)(110136005)(6486002)(66946007)(81156014)(316002)(76116006)(2906002)(6506007)(81166006)(478600001)(86362001)(91956017)(8676002)(26005)(8936002)(36756003)(6636002)(2616005)(6512007)(186003)(66556008)(66476007)(64756008)(44832011)(5660300002)(4326008)(450100002)(66446008)(71200400001)(99106002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: K3hAeVkKYCtvzhtezbuwUVsSkrYWo9Lvv9tjXvp48DIn7SyAw5bwtAQAMrO5IELaK8pHVFDRTbPzuzk0cc+4/V11AuaPcU4UXRLqf0lY/WlNlsdw6XZ797zJR1gXZKjTUfhGdjL/jGfXEd0ok/BKzg==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BF4599DAB99C364E8BF941BF3D9AB379@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cf9e2cc9-f1c2-417c-2470-08d7d964c460
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Apr 2020 13:25:10.9827 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 297nlHvYcZZLrMVY4gPgfx6A6M/vBP16yC/wQhKgLhJ4u7+PfFORcueQ8uMHJPIPTImP+VsP302Xt94GfW2pmA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB4516
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/6ay_ugJZ-yah_0BpPnyMBEbj-jM>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-30: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 13:25:16 -0000

Hi Magnus,

pe, 2020-04-03 kello 09:17 +0000, Magnus Westerlund kirjoitti:
> > 
> > > 2. Secondly, as this solution is different from the RFC 5770
> should
> > > this
> > > solution have a different service name? The reason I am asking is
> > > that it
> > > depends on how for example how an initiator determine which of
> the
> > > NAT
> > > traversal solution. If there is any intention to use DNS SRV for
> > > example
> > > different service name would make sense. This is primarily to
> verify
> > > that this
> > > has been considered.
> > 
> > I am not an expert on the topic but based on some discussions with
> some
> > colleagues, the SRV records seem to more suitable for
> infrastructure
> > discovery, not really for end-host discovery. Since you asked for
> this,
> > I wrote a new section in the appendix:
> 
> So the main reason for my question was to ensure that you have not
> forgoetten
> that you actually have some dependnecy on the service name that would
> in fact be
> incompatible. That could include some supporting document, for
> example usage of
> SRV records. However, with the below text written, I do find it
> informative. And
> the statement at the end that you don't use SRV records currently is
> also good
> and part to answer one aspect of my question. To conclude, it appears
> to be no
> issues with having the two mechanisms share service name and port. 
> 
> From my perspective it appears to be some benefit in including the
> below
> appendix in the specificaiton, but you should seek consensus on it in
> the WG
> before the document is approved in my opinion.

I have sent an separate email to the WG mailing list on this.

P.S. Thanks for all of your valuable comments!