[Hipsec] [hipsec] Simultaneous end-host mobility & High availability for RVS servers(mechanism of backup RVS)
"HU Zhangfeng" <zfhu2001@163.com> Sun, 30 May 2010 08:43 UTC
Return-Path: <zfhu2001@163.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436603A67E2 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 May 2010 01:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.754
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_95=3, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C+w9SUN+7nD4 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 May 2010 01:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m50-134.163.com (m50-134.163.com [123.125.50.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1B83A67D1 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 May 2010 01:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zfhu (unknown [123.119.252.69]) by smtp4 (Coremail) with SMTP id DtGowLCL5AI7JQJM8nlKAA--.24594S2; Sun, 30 May 2010 16:43:39 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 16:43:38 +0800
From: HU Zhangfeng <zfhu2001@163.com>
To: hipsec <hipsec@ietf.org>
References: <5E1C2F4F-6527-4FDC-9ED6-BC5358F7716A@cs.rwth-aachen.de>, <4BFE90B5.7080308@cs.hut.fi>, <4BFE93AB.8050309@htt-consult.com>, <4BFF62A5.7060508@cs.hut.fi>
Message-ID: <201005301643379532972@163.com>
X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 22 [cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon477460204146_====="
X-CM-TRANSID: DtGowLCL5AI7JQJM8nlKAA--.24594S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoWrtF1rCw1UtFyxJry7Xw47Arb_yoWfCFb_u3 srGryqq3yIkw1Svw4xA3yUZryxWay3Wr13X3y0va1rGa4ktw4DJrZ0ga9xua4fGa1agrZx Crn8Xw42vry3WjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IUb66zUUUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: p2ik3jqqqrqiywtou0bp/1tbitg-fiUtUjvXiqwABsD
Subject: [Hipsec] [hipsec] Simultaneous end-host mobility & High availability for RVS servers(mechanism of backup RVS)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 08:43:59 -0000
hi all, As you know, 1) the scenario of simultaneous end-host mobility maybe actually exist in real world, while it still has not been specified in HIP. 2) RVS servers in HIP functioning as HAs in MIP play very important roles for the management of mobile nodes. If a RVS server stops working, then all the mobile nodes managed by it should be lost in the network and cannot be re-managed any more before the mobile nodes re-register to a new RVS server. So I'm considering doing some work on both or either of the two above-mentioned topics, and I'm wondering if some ones have completed some work or got some achievement on both of them. Thank you. 2010-05-30 Zhangfeng HU, phD candidate of Broadband Network Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China Email:zfhu2001@gmail.com Tel:86+13811892137
- [Hipsec] Memory-bound puzzles in BEX Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Memory-bound puzzles in BEX Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] Memory-bound puzzles in BEX Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Memory-bound puzzles in BEX Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] Memory-bound puzzles in BEX Robert Moskowitz
- [Hipsec] [hipsec] Simultaneous end-host mobility … HU Zhangfeng