Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Tue, 02 June 2015 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020111A0158 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWvo9l9G4jEh for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF8C01A0145 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f794d6d000004501-94-556da968bff0
Received: from ESESSHC009.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id EB.E4.17665.869AD655; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:02:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [147.214.22.100] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:02:32 +0200
Message-ID: <556DA968.7090500@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:02:32 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <5530E4C1.8070509@ericsson.com> <554780D0.9070301@tomh.org> <5548CCD5.9010108@ericsson.com> <CAE_dhjvYAPuiqj+xkVqiWugPpYz+mFV+nhTeRo7PYm5AnNFbPA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE_dhjvYAPuiqj+xkVqiWugPpYz+mFV+nhTeRo7PYm5AnNFbPA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW7mytxQg7OXWC2mLprMbPHl6DRm i8a7f5gcmD12zrrL7rFkyU8mjz3XNAKYo7hsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyXr6+xljwU6zi5bnTjA2M e4S6GDk4JARMJC6+qOli5AQyxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkcJRRomP7ckYIZzWjxN2u3WwgVbwC2hJb +hcygtgsAioSj1tug8XZBCwktty6zwJiiwpESUz8eogFol5Q4uTMJ2C2CFDvqUkNYDYzUH3L vjvMILawgJnE9P9vweYICaxhlOjeKwNicwoESnz9t4QV5FBmAU2J9bv0IVrlJba/ncMMUa4t sfxZC8sERsFZSLbNQuiYhaRjASPzKkbR4tTi4tx0I2O91KLM5OLi/Dy9vNSSTYzA4D245bfu DsbVrx0PMQpwMCrx8Crw5YYKsSaWFVfmHmKU5mBREuf16goJFRJITyxJzU5NLUgtii8qzUkt PsTIxMEp1cBYue56j2OVkNatB6p173OEM+LqUk/++t11xPDn/efTZx8Wv9ByYonWndKMnLTW NM02ycT8plW8fxr8xZJcdicXdjEunXPr7Ps0ju3f7dMthTse7xbn2NW+U/3N25V1LLNn2OyX 27L0rdjbQ6n59w6Gf2LJfsI0tXbT/533hXaLaQtYXBeyNJ+nxFKckWioxVxUnAgAY98pFT8C AAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/7gQKiTvcKdZbXEw3qNvxvRd71MA>
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:02:37 -0000

Hi Julien,

same question about this draft. When do you intend to revise it?

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 06/05/2015 2:09 AM, Julien Laganier wrote:
> Thanks for the review Tom, I will address your WGLC comments ASAP.
> 
> --julien
> 
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo
> <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for the review, Tom.
>>
>> Julien, could you please look into Tom's comments and address them in a
>> new revision of the draft?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> On 04/05/2015 5:23 PM, Tom Henderson wrote:
>>> On 04/17/2015 03:47 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end
>>>> on May 4th:
>>>>
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis/
>>>>
>>>> Please, send your comments to this list.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>> I had a fresh read of this specification and have the following comments.
>>>
>>> (possibly) technical
>>> --------------------
>>>
>>> RFC 7401 specifies ECDSA and ECDSA_LOW as separate algorithm types, but
>>> this document only mentions ECDSA.  For alignment with RFC 7401, I
>>> suggest to replace references to "ECDSA" with "ECDSA and ECDSA_LOW" as
>>> appropriate (it seems to me that they can reuse the same codepoint).
>>>
>>> I could not find discussion about TTL considerations; are there any?  If
>>> there are no special considerations about TTL, caching, and how records
>>> may be updated, perhaps it would be helpful to state this (and possibly
>>> reference the specification that describes how to expire resource records).
>>>
>>> The document doesn't seem to have any discussion of what to do when a
>>> host wants to register more than one host identity.  I suggest something
>>> along the lines of "there may be multiple HIP RRs associated with a
>>> single name.  It is outside the scope of this specification as to how a
>>> host chooses from between multiple RRs when more than one is returned.
>>> The RVS information may be copied and aligned across multiple RRs, or
>>> may be different for each one; a host SHOULD check that the RVS used is
>>> associated with the HI being used, when multiple choices are present."
>>>
>>> editorial
>>> ---------
>>>
>>> IANA considerations could be made more explicit about exactly what we
>>> are requesting IANA to do; e.g., "the reference to the RR type code
>>> should be updated from RFC 5205 to this specification."  and "this
>>> document requests that IANA allocate a new codepoint for 'ECDSA and
>>> ECDSA_LOW' in the existing registry for IPSECKEY RR."
>>>
>>> Suggest to replace "Singly" with "Single" and "degenerated" with
>>> "degenerate".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>