Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Tue, 02 June 2015 13:02 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020111A0158
for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id MWvo9l9G4jEh for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF8C01A0145
for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f794d6d000004501-94-556da968bff0
Received: from ESESSHC009.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125])
by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id
EB.E4.17665.869AD655; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:02:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [147.214.22.100] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com
(153.88.183.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2;
Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:02:32 +0200
Message-ID: <556DA968.7090500@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:02:32 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <5530E4C1.8070509@ericsson.com> <554780D0.9070301@tomh.org> <5548CCD5.9010108@ericsson.com>
<CAE_dhjvYAPuiqj+xkVqiWugPpYz+mFV+nhTeRo7PYm5AnNFbPA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE_dhjvYAPuiqj+xkVqiWugPpYz+mFV+nhTeRo7PYm5AnNFbPA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW7mytxQg7OXWC2mLprMbPHl6DRm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Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/7gQKiTvcKdZbXEw3qNvxvRd71MA>
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group."
<hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>,
<mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>,
<mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:02:37 -0000
Hi Julien, same question about this draft. When do you intend to revise it? Cheers, Gonzalo On 06/05/2015 2:09 AM, Julien Laganier wrote: > Thanks for the review Tom, I will address your WGLC comments ASAP. > > --julien > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo > <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote: >> Thanks for the review, Tom. >> >> Julien, could you please look into Tom's comments and address them in a >> new revision of the draft? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> On 04/05/2015 5:23 PM, Tom Henderson wrote: >>> On 04/17/2015 03:47 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end >>>> on May 4th: >>>> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis/ >>>> >>>> Please, send your comments to this list. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Gonzalo >>> >>> I had a fresh read of this specification and have the following comments. >>> >>> (possibly) technical >>> -------------------- >>> >>> RFC 7401 specifies ECDSA and ECDSA_LOW as separate algorithm types, but >>> this document only mentions ECDSA. For alignment with RFC 7401, I >>> suggest to replace references to "ECDSA" with "ECDSA and ECDSA_LOW" as >>> appropriate (it seems to me that they can reuse the same codepoint). >>> >>> I could not find discussion about TTL considerations; are there any? If >>> there are no special considerations about TTL, caching, and how records >>> may be updated, perhaps it would be helpful to state this (and possibly >>> reference the specification that describes how to expire resource records). >>> >>> The document doesn't seem to have any discussion of what to do when a >>> host wants to register more than one host identity. I suggest something >>> along the lines of "there may be multiple HIP RRs associated with a >>> single name. It is outside the scope of this specification as to how a >>> host chooses from between multiple RRs when more than one is returned. >>> The RVS information may be copied and aligned across multiple RRs, or >>> may be different for each one; a host SHOULD check that the RVS used is >>> associated with the HI being used, when multiple choices are present." >>> >>> editorial >>> --------- >>> >>> IANA considerations could be made more explicit about exactly what we >>> are requesting IANA to do; e.g., "the reference to the RR type code >>> should be updated from RFC 5205 to this specification." and "this >>> document requests that IANA allocate a new codepoint for 'ECDSA and >>> ECDSA_LOW' in the existing registry for IPSECKEY RR." >>> >>> Suggest to replace "Singly" with "Single" and "degenerated" with >>> "degenerate". >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> Hipsec@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >
- [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis Julien Laganier
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis Julien Laganier