Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS

Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi> Tue, 18 January 2011 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880183A6F74 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:38:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K8zIqZi+xeWN for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:38:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C46C3A6F6D for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hutcs.cs.hut.fi ([130.233.192.10] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.hut.fi with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Pf5F2-0001gA-I1 for hipsec@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:40:32 +0200
Message-ID: <4D3535E0.3060704@cs.hut.fi>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:40:32 +0200
From: Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hipsec@ietf.org
References: <4D3449E3.50904@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D3449E3.50904@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:38:03 -0000

Hi,

On 01/17/2011 03:53 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in our last charter update, we decided to move the certs draft to the
> standards track:
>
> o Specify in a standards track RFC how to carry certificates in the
> base exchange. This was removed from the base HIP spec so that the
> mechanism is specified in a stand-alone spec.
>
> However, I would like to double-check with the group. If we intend to
> specify all this in 5201 bis anyway, it may make sense to publish this
> as an Experimental RFC. If we want 5201bis to reference this spec, then
> it needs to be PS. I would like to get your opinions on this issue?

+1 for standards track