Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal
Miika Komu <miika.komu@hiit.fi> Tue, 04 May 2010 09:42 UTC
Return-Path: <miika.komu@hiit.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AA73A6AAA for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2010 02:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RXZRiAJXliLt for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2010 02:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hutcs.cs.hut.fi (hutcs.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06E73A6A3A for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2010 02:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hutcs.cs.hut.fi ([130.233.192.7] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by hutcs.cs.hut.fi with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.54) id 1O9Edu-0007Be-Eu for hipsec@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 12:42:18 +0300
Message-ID: <4BDFEC09.1020308@hiit.fi>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 12:42:33 +0300
From: Miika Komu <miika.komu@hiit.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10pre) Gecko/20100422 Shredder/3.0.5pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hipsec@ietf.org
References: <4BDBD41E.5030107@ericsson.com> <4BDFE5B7.3020500@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BDFE5B7.3020500@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: miika.komu@hiit.fi
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:42:53 -0000
On 04/05/10 12:15, Erik Nordmark wrote: Hi, > On 05/ 1/10 12:11 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> as you know, we need to recharter the WG in order to move our specs to >> the standards track. I have put together a charter proposal (see >> attachment). Please, let me know if you have any comments on it. > > What is the current state of handling applications that do referrals > with HIP? Last time I looked there wasn't any useful support for this. > > I think preserving that part of the Internet architecture is important > in whatever we put on the standards track. HIP as an experiment has been a success and we want it to proceed to the standards track. So, would it make sense to discuss about HIT prefix delegation in DNS? There is is already some small-scale experience on this.
- [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal Erik Nordmark
- Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal Jan Melen
- Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal Henderson, Thomas R