[Hipsec] Register Question
wenjing du <wenjingduxx@gmail.com> Thu, 04 November 2010 01:14 UTC
Return-Path: <wenjingduxx@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD89928C0EB for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wqvbZV4PXqFX for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com (mail-px0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D193A6910 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi6 with SMTP id 6so86204pxi.31 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=q8rlUVAIBppgVvLTg2KDDpAuXDtujneuA86bLyQlJm0=; b=YqpXro3HboJAgRntxor4r4CW5iwdZUvS7ZouRgCxmxoZrmJMEyFnGtgLgocLtLhW4o Us2L/ho2T9MlEPj/VOOODKJ2qeAz0gT4qHyewXyGJwkBS7D9knGE2atTAyUcgk909Uv7 z/maO1RsWYrXNgUHea55gpPEehMUOmjHCcCY0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LyluknmNS09mWIWGCh21ZAw4oZvR3swgKG6JkjMAnyX4BaomMtzk9rkSRExccsOu2L FVck/Pb+Bn1vyLxDjQSjR8LDgzUyMQFESPltAdDwQ4irxgejK/L0NvJESrIqFcb9Le77 4RMoAR4qlHlfH1MHrPlqoItLLcMnECu3IhB3Y=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.223.15 with SMTP id v15mr10604wfg.330.1288833286400; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.114.3 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:14:46 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTins_Z4uD9FuH50k8EwzQg7=SZBYUSEna1fFvxLY@mail.gmail.com>
From: wenjing du <wenjingduxx@gmail.com>
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd255ae35ec3a04942fe27d"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 02:18:52 -0800
Subject: [Hipsec] Register Question
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:12:24 -0000
Hi all, A mobile node registers its HIT and IP address to a RVS, I am wandering whether the MN will register to a new RVS if one MN moves to another network and its previous RVS does not work? or Does hip provide a mechanism such as DAAP of MIP to detect a RVS of its home area? Evela
- [Hipsec] Register Question wenjing du