[Hipsec] new HIP draft versions

Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org> Mon, 22 September 2014 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <tomh@tomh.org>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A899C1A1B57 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.232
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vJqUNdW-wQy0 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C811C1A1B0E for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1258 invoked by uid 0); 22 Sep 2014 19:42:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) ( by gproxy5.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2014 19:42:36 -0000
Received: from box528.bluehost.com ([]) by CMOut01 with id uKiY1o00S2molgS01KibbX; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:42:35 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=LbyvtFvi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=K/474su/0lCI2gKrDs9DLw==:117 a=K/474su/0lCI2gKrDs9DLw==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=ZSdzdHkL1-cA:10 a=DhAqLwFCtAgA:10 a=q7J0aIbBmN8A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=HYWc1YUsAAAA:8 a=IA_2sfgTpx8A:10 a=rREcAdlOb-AA:10 a=dPhqZvqjLOaZuazYHccA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tomh.org; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=RQrCpsxvLA2RKMnvbI+vXZs8PSS2iiy3AYIWak3SHa4=; b=J4rzOiMndPiOaJbQTHj9w9J812h2F+RXrwcmVY0F4RohB1eradwzZ9IRfQqKdlgH8WH8C4rLtYE+fS9KdLp57kXtC7sTceX/SIDL5OC73zK/p25ppBK+o2FHZv835Azu;
Received: from [] (port=59470 helo=[]) by box528.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <tomh@tomh.org>) id 1XW9VJ-0004u1-9R for hipsec@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:42:33 -0600
Message-ID: <54207BA6.4040006@tomh.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:42:30 -0700
From: Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
References: <20140922181600.12327.27227.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140922181600.12327.27227.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140922181600.12327.27227.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {3122:box528.bluehost.com:tomhorg:tomh.org} {sentby:smtp auth authed with tomh@tomh.org}
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/D5u_gPXornwyrL0BbEFR53TBgtI
Subject: [Hipsec] new HIP draft versions
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:42:40 -0000

All, the changes in draft version 18 are below:

    o  Update ORCHID reference to newly published RFC 7343

    o  Update example checksum section to RFC 7343 HIT prefix of
       2001:20::/28, and fix incorrect Header Length fields

    o  Update IANA considerations comment on legacy HIP_TRANSFORM
       parameter naming

    o  Add 2048-bit MODP DHE group as Group ID value 11.

I realized immediately after publishing version 18 (upon revisiting the 
tracker) that I hadn't updated the typo in the IPv6 documentation prefix 
in Appendix C, so I created draft version 19 for this.  While doing so, 
I discovered that the reference to the IPv4 documentation prefix was 
wrong, so I fixed this.  Finally, I reviewed Appendix E, Section 3.2, 
and RFC 7343 (per Francis Dupont's comment) and made a small change to 
Appendix E that I hope resolves the comment.

    o  Correct documentation prefix in Appendix C from 2001:D88/32 to
       2001:DB8/32, and update IPv6 checksum

    o  Correct documentation prefix reference from RFC 5747 to 5737

    o  Clarified HIT generation in Appendix E

To my knowledge, these updates close all previously raised issues on the 
draft.  It may be worthwhile for another implementation team to confirm 
the new checksum values that I generated for Appendix C.  I do have a 
question about the HIT Suite IDs that I'll post in another message.

- Tom