Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal

Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> Tue, 16 February 2016 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35741B30DF for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 06:01:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xmdYf1hGNDwZ for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 06:01:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C48E1A86E0 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 06:01:52 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f794c6d000006f31-c6-56c32bce158e
Received: from ESESSHC014.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.60]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id A8.EF.28465.ECB23C65; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:01:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from m46.nomadiclab.com (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:01:50 +0100
To: Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>, hipsec@ietf.org
References: <56AB5BCD.7060803@ericsson.com> <56BE47BE.9070406@ericsson.com>
From: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <56C32BCC.9070105@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:01:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56BE47BE.9070406@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7je457cNhBnvmmFpMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGecWrmMq+Mla8WvvVeYGxpssXYwcHBICJhJrDjp0MXICmWIS F+6tZ+ti5OIQEjjMKHF67Q8oZx2jxPuGBlaQKmEBe4mT+26xg9giAtYSHy4vZwKxhQS8JW4e nsgIYjMLqEks+7ETLM4mYCvxu30PmM0roC2xtPk5M4jNIqAqMfXxXrC4qECaxP7Zv6FqBCVO znzCAmJzCuhI/Pp4mB3kUGagvQ+2lkGMl5fY/nYOM8RaVYmr/14xTmAUnIWkexZCxywkHQsY mVcxihanFhfnphsZ66UWZSYXF+fn6eWllmxiBIblwS2/dXcwrn7teIhRgINRiYe3IOJQmBBr YllxZe4hRgkOZiUR3n+vgEK8KYmVValF+fFFpTmpxYcYpTlYlMR51zivDxMSSE8sSc1OTS1I LYLJMnFwSjUwZlubTszzE08xUdZfGHqoZMLmzbslVrX+t7G07ogw/jpFTTvSbbPBPvfiDSvd 9j+XYlV2+L9E7gEHn+JMCUHhrv/SF+Q9k6ftvVrTyLjA7ECHx8Lmm2vS/09cyDslYnG72Zav D/w+KQerLazy2sjjlZRtGVF/al95+qSdRqayOpOVjjcYX+hTYinOSDTUYi4qTgQApeaqSUcC AAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/DsSplJ7UaOnVHbA_r3-vE_QnK2I>
Cc: Jan Melen <jan.melen@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:01:54 -0000

On 12/02/16 22:59, Miika Komu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/29/2016 02:32 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end
>> on February 12th:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/
>>
>> Please, send your comments to this list.
>
> in general, the draft should have a short intro to the NAT traversal
> procedure and re-introduce some terms even though it all is specified in
> RFC5770. This would make the draft a bit easier to read. I have also
> some other nits which I'll send a bit later.

Thanks for the review Miika! Also Petri commented along the same lines. 
We'll add some intro text to the draft to address this.


Cheers,
Ari