Re: [Hipsec] Using a PAKE within HIP for enrollment

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Wed, 27 July 2016 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C423A12D0E3 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YtyHARxdJms4 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [50.253.254.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FEF212B030 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290FF62218 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:34:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fJDbtQBoPRW6 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:34:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx120e.htt-consult.com (unknown [209.65.105.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EDB9621D2 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:34:30 -0400 (EDT)
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
References: <76ef2589-9016-cdde-afb2-99224327effd@htt-consult.com>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <f3fb642c-1f59-ebdb-aa72-9a9cdc2ab305@htt-consult.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:34:22 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <76ef2589-9016-cdde-afb2-99224327effd@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/DycLPXDiMYLXpMSOZFkbZq_4gKM>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Using a PAKE within HIP for enrollment
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:34:46 -0000

I am going to just use the DEX authentication for now.  But moving to a 
PAKE-styled authentication, given that we have a DH exchange is rather 
enticing.  Dragonfly may be easy to do; I did follow it in 802.11.  But 
maybe one of the others might be where cfrg is headed and where I should 
look at?

On 07/27/2016 06:19 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am looking at a HIT enrollment function using 5403-bis.  But why 
> should the Registrar accept the Register.  This is our basic need of 
> an Out-off-Band process to trust an enrollment.
>
>
> So assume that some process establishes a PSK between the two 
> parties.  Perhaps a failed enrollment that sent the phone's # that 
> returns an SMS message with the PSK.  The enrollment then grabs that 
> PSK and uses a PAKE HIP parameter for authentication.  This would be 
> stronger than what I have in DEX...
>
>
> I would like to get the draft done this week, or early next week. It 
> is mostly written.  But I need to put in the trust for the 
> enrollment.  I can either lift what I have in DEX, or go with one of 
> the PAKE efforts in CFRG.  But which one and how would it work in HIP 
> BEX/DEX?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>