Re: [Hipsec] HIP draft updates
Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi> Wed, 30 July 2014 09:39 UTC
Return-Path: <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFF81B2A25 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 02:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gw5lksb-7L68 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 02:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346511A0176 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 02:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hutcs.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.10]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B5D308748 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:39:03 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <53D8BD2B.5030100@cs.hut.fi>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:38:51 +0300
From: Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hipsec@ietf.org
References: <53D6CA07.10604@tomh.org>
In-Reply-To: <53D6CA07.10604@tomh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/EwaIM-scn_SAzXbHmcDXyHsb9ic
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] HIP draft updates
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:39:09 -0000
Hi Tom, On 07/29/2014 01:09 AM, Tom Henderson wrote: > > For RFC5202bis, the main issue is the recommendation of NULL encryption > as a MUST to implement (issue 43). This has been discussed on the saag > list and on this list, and I don't think it is yet resolved although I > would like to again suggest my proposed resolution: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg03894.html your suggestion works for me.
- [Hipsec] HIP draft updates Tom Henderson
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP draft updates Miika Komu